From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 13:03:24 +0100 Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: sunxi: document new generic binding In-Reply-To: References: <20171113012523.2328-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20171113012523.2328-2-andre.przywara@arm.com> Message-ID: <20171124120324.da6ihbdirtyi7unx@flea.lan> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Linus, On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 11:19:52AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Andre Przywara wrote: > > > So far all the Allwinner pinctrl drivers provided a table in the > > kernel to describe all the pins and the link between the pinctrl functions > > names (strings) and their respective mux values (register values). > > > > Extend the binding to put those mappings in the DT, so that any SoC can > > describe its pinctrl and GPIO data fully there instead of relying on > > tables. > > This uses a generic compatible name, to be prepended with an SoC > > specific name in the node. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > (...) > > I definately want feedback from Maxime before I do anything with > this patch series. So I've been opposed to it as well, for the reasons Rob, Thierry and you pointed out already in that thread I just wasn't sure what your opinion on it was, so I didn't answer just so that I could see if I was the only one pushing back. So I guess we all agree here. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: