From: ynorov@caviumnetworks.com (Yury Norov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 35/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Get rid of vgic_elrsr
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 17:39:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171126143902.vwunp2uucw42xvwo@yury-thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171012104141.26902-36-christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:41:39PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> There is really no need to store the vgic_elrsr on the VGIC data
> structures as the only need we have for the elrsr is to figure out if an
> LR is inavtive when we save the VGIC state upon returning from the
> guest. We can might as well store this in a temporary local variable.
>
> This also gets rid of the endianness conversion in the VGIC save
> function, which is completely unnecessary and would actually result in
> incorrect functionality on big-endian systems,
Does it mean that existing code in mainline is broken for BE systems?
If so, I think that it should be fixed in separated patch...
> because we are only using
> typed values here and not converting pointers and reading different
> types here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> ---
> include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 2 --
> virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c | 6 +++---
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c | 33 +++++++--------------------------
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c | 1 -
> 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> index 34dba51..79c9e67 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> @@ -237,7 +237,6 @@ struct vgic_dist {
> struct vgic_v2_cpu_if {
> u32 vgic_hcr;
> u32 vgic_vmcr;
> - u64 vgic_elrsr; /* Saved only */
> u32 vgic_apr;
> u32 vgic_lr[VGIC_V2_MAX_LRS];
> };
> @@ -246,7 +245,6 @@ struct vgic_v3_cpu_if {
> u32 vgic_hcr;
> u32 vgic_vmcr;
> u32 vgic_sre; /* Restored only, change ignored */
> - u32 vgic_elrsr; /* Saved only */
> u32 vgic_ap0r[4];
> u32 vgic_ap1r[4];
> u64 vgic_lr[VGIC_V3_MAX_LRS];
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> index 91728fa..05548b2 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> @@ -222,15 +222,16 @@ void __hyp_text __vgic_v3_save_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (used_lrs) {
> int i;
> u32 nr_pre_bits;
> + u32 elrsr;
>
> - cpu_if->vgic_elrsr = read_gicreg(ICH_ELSR_EL2);
> + elrsr = read_gicreg(ICH_ELSR_EL2);
>
> write_gicreg(0, ICH_HCR_EL2);
> val = read_gicreg(ICH_VTR_EL2);
> nr_pre_bits = vtr_to_nr_pre_bits(val);
>
> for (i = 0; i < used_lrs; i++) {
> - if (cpu_if->vgic_elrsr & (1 << i))
> + if (elrsr & (1 << i))
Same comments as to patch 28. Here should be test_bit(), I think.
And if it's possible, for set bits in elrsr it's simpler not to write
~ICH_LR_STATE to cpu_if->vgic_lr, but directly to IO memory in
__vgic_v3_restore_state().
> cpu_if->vgic_lr[i] &= ~ICH_LR_STATE;
> else
> cpu_if->vgic_lr[i] = __gic_v3_get_lr(i);
> @@ -261,7 +262,6 @@ void __hyp_text __vgic_v3_save_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (static_branch_unlikely(&vgic_v3_cpuif_trap))
> write_gicreg(0, ICH_HCR_EL2);
>
> - cpu_if->vgic_elrsr = 0xffff;
> cpu_if->vgic_ap0r[0] = 0;
> cpu_if->vgic_ap0r[1] = 0;
> cpu_if->vgic_ap0r[2] = 0;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
> index 259079b..df7e03b 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
> @@ -247,7 +247,6 @@ void vgic_v2_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * anyway.
> */
> vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_vmcr = 0;
> - vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_elrsr = ~0;
>
> /* Get the show on the road... */
> vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_hcr = GICH_HCR_EN;
> @@ -404,33 +403,19 @@ int vgic_v2_probe(const struct gic_kvm_info *info)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static void save_elrsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void __iomem *base)
> -{
> - struct vgic_v2_cpu_if *cpu_if = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2;
> - int nr_lr = kvm_vgic_global_state.nr_lr;
> - u32 elrsr0, elrsr1;
> -
> - elrsr0 = readl_relaxed(base + GICH_ELRSR0);
> - if (unlikely(nr_lr > 32))
> - elrsr1 = readl_relaxed(base + GICH_ELRSR1);
> - else
> - elrsr1 = 0;
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
> - cpu_if->vgic_elrsr = ((u64)elrsr0 << 32) | elrsr1;
> -#else
> - cpu_if->vgic_elrsr = ((u64)elrsr1 << 32) | elrsr0;
> -#endif
> -}
> -
> static void save_lrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void __iomem *base)
> {
> struct vgic_v2_cpu_if *cpu_if = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2;
> - int i;
> u64 used_lrs = vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.used_lrs;
Not to this patch, but anyway, what for to reserve u64 for used_lrs
here and in struct vgic_cpu, when maximum value for it is 64?
> + u64 elrsr;
> + int i;
Nit. What for you move 'int i' declaration?
> +
> + elrsr = readl_relaxed(base + GICH_ELRSR0);
> + if (unlikely(used_lrs > 32))
> + elrsr |= ((u64)readl_relaxed(base + GICH_ELRSR1)) << 32;
>
> for (i = 0; i < used_lrs; i++) {
> - if (cpu_if->vgic_elrsr & (1UL << i))
> + if (elrsr & (1UL << i))
test_bit()
> cpu_if->vgic_lr[i] &= ~GICH_LR_STATE;
> else
> cpu_if->vgic_lr[i] = readl_relaxed(base + GICH_LR0 + (i * 4));
> @@ -452,13 +437,9 @@ void vgic_v2_save_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> if (used_lrs) {
> cpu_if->vgic_apr = readl_relaxed(base + GICH_APR);
> -
> - save_elrsr(vcpu, base);
> save_lrs(vcpu, base);
> -
> writel_relaxed(0, base + GICH_HCR);
> } else {
> - cpu_if->vgic_elrsr = ~0UL;
> cpu_if->vgic_apr = 0;
> }
> }
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> index 863351c..0900649 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> @@ -237,7 +237,6 @@ void vgic_v3_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * anyway.
> */
> vgic_v3->vgic_vmcr = 0;
> - vgic_v3->vgic_elrsr = ~0;
>
> /*
> * If we are emulating a GICv3, we do it in an non-GICv2-compatible
> --
> 2.9.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-26 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-12 10:41 [PATCH 00/37] Optimize KVM/ARM for VHE systems Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 01/37] KVM: arm64: Avoid storing the vcpu pointer on the stack Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 15:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-12 17:02 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-13 11:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-11-23 20:59 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-27 11:11 ` James Morse
2017-11-29 18:20 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-06 17:22 ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-07 8:24 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 02/37] KVM: arm64: Rework hyp_panic for VHE and non-VHE Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 15:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-12 17:06 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 03/37] KVM: arm64: Move HCR_INT_OVERRIDE to default HCR_EL2 guest flag Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 16:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 04/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Get rid of vcpu->arch.irq_lines Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 16:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-11-06 17:58 ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-14 12:17 ` Julien Thierry
2017-11-16 16:11 ` Julien Thierry
2017-11-26 16:04 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 05/37] KVM: Record the executing ioctl number on the vcpu struct Christoffer Dall
2017-10-13 17:13 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-10-13 17:31 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-13 18:38 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-10-13 18:51 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 10:45 ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-22 20:28 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 06/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Only load/put VCPU state for KVM_RUN Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 07/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Add kvm_vcpu_load_sysregs and kvm_vcpu_put_sysregs Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 10:56 ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-07 11:10 ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-22 20:34 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-23 11:08 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 08/37] KVM: arm64: Defer restoring host VFP state to vcpu_put Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 13:15 ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-26 16:24 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-15 16:04 ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-26 16:17 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-27 8:32 ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-25 7:52 ` Yury Norov
2017-11-26 16:17 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-26 18:58 ` Yury Norov
2017-11-26 19:18 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-27 6:25 ` Yury Norov
2017-11-30 19:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 09/37] KVM: arm64: Move debug dirty flag calculation out of world switch Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 14:09 ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-25 8:09 ` Yury Norov
2017-12-01 17:25 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-12-03 13:17 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 10/37] KVM: arm64: Slightly improve debug save/restore functions Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 14:22 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-01 17:51 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-14 16:42 ` Julien Thierry
2017-12-01 15:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-12-06 15:38 ` Julien Thierry
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 11/37] KVM: arm64: Improve debug register save/restore flow Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 14:48 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-01 17:52 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-12-03 13:49 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 20:47 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 12/37] KVM: arm64: Factor out fault info population and gic workarounds Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 15:12 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 13/37] KVM: arm64: Introduce VHE-specific kvm_vcpu_run Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 15:25 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-01 18:10 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 14/37] KVM: arm64: Remove kern_hyp_va() use in VHE switch function Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 16:07 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 15/37] KVM: arm64: Don't deactivate VM on VHE systems Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 16:14 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 19:27 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 16/37] KVM: arm64: Remove noop calls to timer save/restore from VHE switch Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 16:25 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 19:27 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 17/37] KVM: arm64: Move userspace system registers into separate function Christoffer Dall
2017-11-08 9:32 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 19:36 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 18/37] KVM: arm64: Rewrite sysreg alternatives to static keys Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 19/37] KVM: arm64: Introduce separate VHE/non-VHE sysreg save/restore functions Christoffer Dall
2017-11-08 10:31 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 20/37] KVM: arm64: Unify non-VHE host/guest sysreg save and restore functions Christoffer Dall
2017-11-08 10:39 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 19:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 21/37] KVM: arm64: Don't save the host ELR_EL2 and SPSR_EL2 on VHE systems Christoffer Dall
2017-11-08 17:03 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 19:45 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 22/37] KVM: arm64: Change 32-bit handling of VM system registers Christoffer Dall
2017-11-13 16:25 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 23/37] KVM: arm64: Prepare to handle traps on deferred VM sysregs Christoffer Dall
2017-11-13 17:54 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 19:50 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-12-04 10:05 ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 24/37] KVM: arm64: Prepare to handle traps on deferred EL0 sysregs Christoffer Dall
2017-11-15 9:25 ` Julien Thierry
2017-12-03 19:51 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 25/37] KVM: arm64: Prepare to handle traps on remaining deferred EL1 sysregs Christoffer Dall
2017-11-13 18:56 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 20:29 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 26/37] KVM: arm64: Prepare to handle traps on deferred AArch32 sysregs Christoffer Dall
2017-11-13 19:07 ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 20:35 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 27/37] KVM: arm64: Defer saving/restoring system registers to vcpu load/put on VHE Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 28/37] KVM: arm64: Move common VHE/non-VHE trap config in separate functions Christoffer Dall
2017-11-25 10:43 ` Yury Norov
2017-11-25 10:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 29/37] KVM: arm64: Configure FPSIMD traps on vcpu load/put for VHE Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 30/37] KVM: arm64: Configure c15, PMU, and debug register traps on cpu " Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 31/37] KVM: arm64: Separate activate_traps and deactive_traps for VHE and non-VHE Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 32/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Handle VGICv2 save/restore from the main VGIC code Christoffer Dall
2017-11-15 17:50 ` Andre Przywara
2017-11-26 10:29 ` Yury Norov
2017-11-26 19:46 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-30 12:09 ` Yury Norov
2017-11-26 19:37 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 33/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Move arm64-only vgic-v2-sr.c file to arm64 Christoffer Dall
2017-11-15 17:52 ` Andre Przywara
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 34/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Handle VGICv3 save/restore from the main VGIC code on VHE Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 35/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Get rid of vgic_elrsr Christoffer Dall
2017-11-26 14:39 ` Yury Norov [this message]
2017-11-26 19:53 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 36/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Move VGIC APR save/restore to vgic put/load Christoffer Dall
2017-11-26 15:09 ` Yury Norov
2017-11-26 19:55 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 37/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Avoid VGICv3 save/restore on VHE with no IRQs Christoffer Dall
2017-11-30 18:33 ` Yury Norov
2017-12-03 20:38 ` Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171126143902.vwunp2uucw42xvwo@yury-thinkpad \
--to=ynorov@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox