Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ynorov@caviumnetworks.com (Yury Norov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 35/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Get rid of vgic_elrsr
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 17:39:02 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171126143902.vwunp2uucw42xvwo@yury-thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171012104141.26902-36-christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:41:39PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> There is really no need to store the vgic_elrsr on the VGIC data
> structures as the only need we have for the elrsr is to figure out if an
> LR is inavtive when we save the VGIC state upon returning from the
> guest.  We can might as well store this in a temporary local variable.
> 
> This also gets rid of the endianness conversion in the VGIC save
> function, which is completely unnecessary and would actually result in
> incorrect functionality on big-endian systems,

Does it mean that existing code in mainline is broken for BE systems?
If so, I think that it should be fixed in separated patch...

> because we are only using
> typed values here and not converting pointers and reading different
> types here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> ---
>  include/kvm/arm_vgic.h        |  2 --
>  virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c |  6 +++---
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c   | 33 +++++++--------------------------
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c   |  1 -
>  4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> index 34dba51..79c9e67 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> @@ -237,7 +237,6 @@ struct vgic_dist {
>  struct vgic_v2_cpu_if {
>  	u32		vgic_hcr;
>  	u32		vgic_vmcr;
> -	u64		vgic_elrsr;	/* Saved only */
>  	u32		vgic_apr;
>  	u32		vgic_lr[VGIC_V2_MAX_LRS];
>  };
> @@ -246,7 +245,6 @@ struct vgic_v3_cpu_if {
>  	u32		vgic_hcr;
>  	u32		vgic_vmcr;
>  	u32		vgic_sre;	/* Restored only, change ignored */
> -	u32		vgic_elrsr;	/* Saved only */
>  	u32		vgic_ap0r[4];
>  	u32		vgic_ap1r[4];
>  	u64		vgic_lr[VGIC_V3_MAX_LRS];
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> index 91728fa..05548b2 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c
> @@ -222,15 +222,16 @@ void __hyp_text __vgic_v3_save_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	if (used_lrs) {
>  		int i;
>  		u32 nr_pre_bits;
> +		u32 elrsr;
>  
> -		cpu_if->vgic_elrsr = read_gicreg(ICH_ELSR_EL2);
> +		elrsr = read_gicreg(ICH_ELSR_EL2);
>  
>  		write_gicreg(0, ICH_HCR_EL2);
>  		val = read_gicreg(ICH_VTR_EL2);
>  		nr_pre_bits = vtr_to_nr_pre_bits(val);
>  
>  		for (i = 0; i < used_lrs; i++) {
> -			if (cpu_if->vgic_elrsr & (1 << i))
> +			if (elrsr & (1 << i))

Same comments as to patch 28. Here should be test_bit(), I think.
And if it's possible, for set bits in elrsr it's simpler not to write
~ICH_LR_STATE to cpu_if->vgic_lr, but directly to IO memory in
__vgic_v3_restore_state().

>  				cpu_if->vgic_lr[i] &= ~ICH_LR_STATE;
>  			else
>  				cpu_if->vgic_lr[i] = __gic_v3_get_lr(i);
> @@ -261,7 +262,6 @@ void __hyp_text __vgic_v3_save_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		if (static_branch_unlikely(&vgic_v3_cpuif_trap))
>  			write_gicreg(0, ICH_HCR_EL2);
>  
> -		cpu_if->vgic_elrsr = 0xffff;
>  		cpu_if->vgic_ap0r[0] = 0;
>  		cpu_if->vgic_ap0r[1] = 0;
>  		cpu_if->vgic_ap0r[2] = 0;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
> index 259079b..df7e03b 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
> @@ -247,7 +247,6 @@ void vgic_v2_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	 * anyway.
>  	 */
>  	vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_vmcr = 0;
> -	vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_elrsr = ~0;
>  
>  	/* Get the show on the road... */
>  	vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2.vgic_hcr = GICH_HCR_EN;
> @@ -404,33 +403,19 @@ int vgic_v2_probe(const struct gic_kvm_info *info)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static void save_elrsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void __iomem *base)
> -{
> -	struct vgic_v2_cpu_if *cpu_if = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2;
> -	int nr_lr = kvm_vgic_global_state.nr_lr;
> -	u32 elrsr0, elrsr1;
> -
> -	elrsr0 = readl_relaxed(base + GICH_ELRSR0);
> -	if (unlikely(nr_lr > 32))
> -		elrsr1 = readl_relaxed(base + GICH_ELRSR1);
> -	else
> -		elrsr1 = 0;
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
> -	cpu_if->vgic_elrsr = ((u64)elrsr0 << 32) | elrsr1;
> -#else
> -	cpu_if->vgic_elrsr = ((u64)elrsr1 << 32) | elrsr0;
> -#endif
> -}
> -
>  static void save_lrs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void __iomem *base)
>  {
>  	struct vgic_v2_cpu_if *cpu_if = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v2;
> -	int i;
>  	u64 used_lrs = vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.used_lrs;

Not to this patch, but anyway, what for to reserve u64 for used_lrs
here and in struct vgic_cpu, when maximum value for it is 64?

> +	u64 elrsr;
> +	int i;

Nit. What for you move 'int i' declaration?

> +
> +	elrsr = readl_relaxed(base + GICH_ELRSR0);
> +	if (unlikely(used_lrs > 32))
> +		elrsr |= ((u64)readl_relaxed(base + GICH_ELRSR1)) << 32;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < used_lrs; i++) {
> -		if (cpu_if->vgic_elrsr & (1UL << i))
> +		if (elrsr & (1UL << i))

test_bit()

>  			cpu_if->vgic_lr[i] &= ~GICH_LR_STATE;
>  		else
>  			cpu_if->vgic_lr[i] = readl_relaxed(base + GICH_LR0 + (i * 4));
> @@ -452,13 +437,9 @@ void vgic_v2_save_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  	if (used_lrs) {
>  		cpu_if->vgic_apr = readl_relaxed(base + GICH_APR);
> -
> -		save_elrsr(vcpu, base);
>  		save_lrs(vcpu, base);
> -
>  		writel_relaxed(0, base + GICH_HCR);
>  	} else {
> -		cpu_if->vgic_elrsr = ~0UL;
>  		cpu_if->vgic_apr = 0;
>  	}
>  }
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> index 863351c..0900649 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> @@ -237,7 +237,6 @@ void vgic_v3_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	 * anyway.
>  	 */
>  	vgic_v3->vgic_vmcr = 0;
> -	vgic_v3->vgic_elrsr = ~0;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If we are emulating a GICv3, we do it in an non-GICv2-compatible
> -- 
> 2.9.0

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-26 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-12 10:41 [PATCH 00/37] Optimize KVM/ARM for VHE systems Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 01/37] KVM: arm64: Avoid storing the vcpu pointer on the stack Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 15:49   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-12 17:02     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-13 11:31       ` Marc Zyngier
2017-11-23 20:59     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-27 11:11       ` James Morse
2017-11-29 18:20         ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-06 17:22   ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-07  8:24     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 02/37] KVM: arm64: Rework hyp_panic for VHE and non-VHE Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 15:55   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-12 17:06     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 03/37] KVM: arm64: Move HCR_INT_OVERRIDE to default HCR_EL2 guest flag Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 16:20   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 04/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Get rid of vcpu->arch.irq_lines Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 16:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-11-06 17:58   ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-14 12:17   ` Julien Thierry
2017-11-16 16:11     ` Julien Thierry
2017-11-26 16:04     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 05/37] KVM: Record the executing ioctl number on the vcpu struct Christoffer Dall
2017-10-13 17:13   ` Radim Krčmář
2017-10-13 17:31     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-13 18:38       ` Radim Krčmář
2017-10-13 18:51         ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 10:45   ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-22 20:28     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 06/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Only load/put VCPU state for KVM_RUN Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 07/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Add kvm_vcpu_load_sysregs and kvm_vcpu_put_sysregs Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 10:56   ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-07 11:10   ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-22 20:34     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-23 11:08       ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 08/37] KVM: arm64: Defer restoring host VFP state to vcpu_put Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 13:15   ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-26 16:24     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-15 16:04   ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-26 16:17     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-27  8:32       ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-25  7:52   ` Yury Norov
2017-11-26 16:17     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-26 18:58       ` Yury Norov
2017-11-26 19:18         ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-27  6:25           ` Yury Norov
2017-11-30 19:07         ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 09/37] KVM: arm64: Move debug dirty flag calculation out of world switch Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 14:09   ` Andrew Jones
2017-11-25  8:09     ` Yury Norov
2017-12-01 17:25     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-12-03 13:17       ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 10/37] KVM: arm64: Slightly improve debug save/restore functions Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 14:22   ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-01 17:51     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-14 16:42   ` Julien Thierry
2017-12-01 15:19     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-12-06 15:38       ` Julien Thierry
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 11/37] KVM: arm64: Improve debug register save/restore flow Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 14:48   ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-01 17:52     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-12-03 13:49       ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 20:47         ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 12/37] KVM: arm64: Factor out fault info population and gic workarounds Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 15:12   ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 13/37] KVM: arm64: Introduce VHE-specific kvm_vcpu_run Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 15:25   ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-01 18:10     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 14/37] KVM: arm64: Remove kern_hyp_va() use in VHE switch function Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 16:07   ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 15/37] KVM: arm64: Don't deactivate VM on VHE systems Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 16:14   ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 19:27     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 16/37] KVM: arm64: Remove noop calls to timer save/restore from VHE switch Christoffer Dall
2017-11-07 16:25   ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 19:27     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 17/37] KVM: arm64: Move userspace system registers into separate function Christoffer Dall
2017-11-08  9:32   ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 19:36     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 18/37] KVM: arm64: Rewrite sysreg alternatives to static keys Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 19/37] KVM: arm64: Introduce separate VHE/non-VHE sysreg save/restore functions Christoffer Dall
2017-11-08 10:31   ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 20/37] KVM: arm64: Unify non-VHE host/guest sysreg save and restore functions Christoffer Dall
2017-11-08 10:39   ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 19:41     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 21/37] KVM: arm64: Don't save the host ELR_EL2 and SPSR_EL2 on VHE systems Christoffer Dall
2017-11-08 17:03   ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 19:45     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 22/37] KVM: arm64: Change 32-bit handling of VM system registers Christoffer Dall
2017-11-13 16:25   ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 23/37] KVM: arm64: Prepare to handle traps on deferred VM sysregs Christoffer Dall
2017-11-13 17:54   ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 19:50     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-12-04 10:05       ` Andrew Jones
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 24/37] KVM: arm64: Prepare to handle traps on deferred EL0 sysregs Christoffer Dall
2017-11-15  9:25   ` Julien Thierry
2017-12-03 19:51     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 25/37] KVM: arm64: Prepare to handle traps on remaining deferred EL1 sysregs Christoffer Dall
2017-11-13 18:56   ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 20:29     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 26/37] KVM: arm64: Prepare to handle traps on deferred AArch32 sysregs Christoffer Dall
2017-11-13 19:07   ` Andrew Jones
2017-12-03 20:35     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 27/37] KVM: arm64: Defer saving/restoring system registers to vcpu load/put on VHE Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 28/37] KVM: arm64: Move common VHE/non-VHE trap config in separate functions Christoffer Dall
2017-11-25 10:43   ` Yury Norov
2017-11-25 10:49     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 29/37] KVM: arm64: Configure FPSIMD traps on vcpu load/put for VHE Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 30/37] KVM: arm64: Configure c15, PMU, and debug register traps on cpu " Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 31/37] KVM: arm64: Separate activate_traps and deactive_traps for VHE and non-VHE Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 32/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Handle VGICv2 save/restore from the main VGIC code Christoffer Dall
2017-11-15 17:50   ` Andre Przywara
2017-11-26 10:29     ` Yury Norov
2017-11-26 19:46       ` Christoffer Dall
2017-11-30 12:09         ` Yury Norov
2017-11-26 19:37     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 33/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Move arm64-only vgic-v2-sr.c file to arm64 Christoffer Dall
2017-11-15 17:52   ` Andre Przywara
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 34/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Handle VGICv3 save/restore from the main VGIC code on VHE Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 35/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Get rid of vgic_elrsr Christoffer Dall
2017-11-26 14:39   ` Yury Norov [this message]
2017-11-26 19:53     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 36/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Move VGIC APR save/restore to vgic put/load Christoffer Dall
2017-11-26 15:09   ` Yury Norov
2017-11-26 19:55     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-10-12 10:41 ` [PATCH 37/37] KVM: arm/arm64: Avoid VGICv3 save/restore on VHE with no IRQs Christoffer Dall
2017-11-30 18:33   ` Yury Norov
2017-12-03 20:38     ` Christoffer Dall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171126143902.vwunp2uucw42xvwo@yury-thinkpad \
    --to=ynorov@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox