From: linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm: l2c: unlock ways when in non-secure mode
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 09:19:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171127091937.GA31757@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB6PR04MB3221D60D0EC8D5B31869AA6588240@DB6PR04MB3221.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 11:56:10PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: l2c: unlock ways when in non-secure mode
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 08:25:30PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > To boot Linux in Non-secure mode with l2x0, the l2x0 controller is
> > > enabled in secure mode and ways locked to make it seems L2 cache
> > > disabled during linux boot process. So during l2x0 initialization,
> > > need to unlock the ways to make l2x0 could cache data/inst.
> >
> > Why was this chosen instead of doing what everyone else does?
>
> I am not aware of how other platform handles the l2x0 unlock in non
> secure mode. Could you please share with me what others choose?
That's not what I was asking.
Everyone else provides a way for the l2x0 controller to be enabled and
disabled from non-secure mode.
Why have you decided to enable the l2x0 controller and leave it enabled,
and then lock down all the cache ways - which means you need the kernel
to do something entirely different for your platform.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-27 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-26 12:25 [PATCH] arm: l2c: unlock ways when in non-secure mode Peng Fan
2017-11-26 13:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-11-26 23:56 ` Peng Fan
2017-11-27 9:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2017-11-27 9:43 ` Peng Fan
2017-11-27 10:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-11-28 1:57 ` Peng Fan
2017-12-03 11:20 ` Peng Fan
2017-12-05 16:03 ` Etienne Carriere
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171127091937.GA31757@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).