From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cdall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 20:28:25 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 11/15] KVM: Move vcpu_load to arch-specific kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug In-Reply-To: <20171125205718.7731-12-christoffer.dall@linaro.org> References: <20171125205718.7731-1-christoffer.dall@linaro.org> <20171125205718.7731-12-christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20171127192825.GA16941@cbox> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Replying to myself again... On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 09:57:14PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote: > Move vcpu_load() and vcpu_put() into the architecture specific > implementations of kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(). > > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 17 ++++++++++++++--- > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 6 ++++++ > arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------ > arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 14 +++++++++++--- > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 6 +++++- > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 4 ---- > 6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > [...] > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > index aa76d2988178..ac26d95444c9 100644 > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c > @@ -2819,15 +2819,20 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_translate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > struct kvm_guest_debug *dbg) > { > - int rc = 0; > + int rc; > + > + rc = vcpu_load(vcpu); > + if (rc) > + return rc; > > vcpu->guest_debug = 0; > kvm_s390_clear_bp_data(vcpu); > > + rc = -EINVAL; > if (dbg->control & ~VALID_GUESTDBG_FLAGS) > - return -EINVAL; > + goto out; > if (!sclp.has_gpere) > - return -EINVAL; > + goto out; > > if (dbg->control & KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE) { > vcpu->guest_debug = dbg->control; > @@ -2847,6 +2852,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > atomic_andnot(CPUSTAT_P, &vcpu->arch.sie_block->cpuflags); > } > > + rc = 0; This is totally broken (although not clearly visible in the diff), because it overrides a potential error code. I'll fix it for v2. > +out: > + vcpu_put(vcpu); > return rc; > } > Thanks, -Christoffer