From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 21:43:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 12/17] drm/sun4i: Add CCSC property to DE2 configuration In-Reply-To: <1763fe2cf572135ef030a26a32b907d7@aosc.io> References: <20171127205750.19277-1-jernej.skrabec@siol.net> <20171127205750.19277-13-jernej.skrabec@siol.net> <1763fe2cf572135ef030a26a32b907d7@aosc.io> Message-ID: <20171128204353.imy2rd6fy7hzrvzg@flea.home> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 08:02:26PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > ? 2017-11-28 04:57?Jernej Skrabec ??? > > Base addresses of channel output CSC (CCSC) depends whether mixer in > > question is first or second and if it is second, if supports VEP or not. > > This new property will tell which set of base addresses to take. > > > > 0 - first mixer or second mixer with VEP support > > 1 - second mixer without VEP support > > Maxime, > > I think here the ID of the mixer matters. > > P.S. I didn't found any SoC with a second mixer with VEP currently Then we'll have an allwinner,has-vep; property (or whatever) for all those SoCs' mixer0. What's the big deal about it? Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: