From: cdall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: handle the translation table walk RAS error
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 14:22:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171129132212.GA10563@lvm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1511988524-30240-1-git-send-email-gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 04:48:44AM +0800, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
> For the RAS Synchronous External Abort, there are two types.
> One is memory access, it will be handled by host APEI driver.
> Another is translation table walk, in essence, it is hardware
> memory error on stage1 or stage2 page table.
>
> For the guest stage1 translation table error, if host APEI
> driver handles it, APEI driver will unmap this page for the
> stage1 page table, then switch to guest, guest reused this
> page table and generate stage2 data abort, KVM deliver SIGBUS
> to user space. User space inject this error to guest, when
> guest handle this abort, it may also use this stage1 page
> table, but it already unmap by host APEI driver, then
> generate stage2 data abort again, so this will lead to dead
> loop.
Why does it lead to a loop? If the host has marked a page as unusable,
shouldn't the guest stage 1 page table be backed by a different page
when the fault happens on stage 2?
>
> For the guest stage2 translation table error, if host APEI
> driver handles it, it will do nothing.
>
> So for above reasons, we directly inject this Synchronous
> External Abort to guest and let guest handle it, for example,
> kill the guest application or panic guest OS.
I don't see why we need to distinguish between what caused a memory
access error, a direct access or a page table walk, in terms of how the
host/guest interaction works here.
What is the fundamental difference?
Thanks,
-Christoffer
>
> Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h | 2 ++
> virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> index 1188272..b8cb67a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
> @@ -217,6 +217,8 @@
> #define FSC_SECC_TTW2 (0x1e)
> #define FSC_SECC_TTW3 (0x1f)
>
> +#define FSC_SEA_TTW FSC_SEA_TTW0
> +
> /* Hyp Prefetch Fault Address Register (HPFAR/HDFAR) */
> #define HPFAR_MASK (~UL(0xf))
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> index b36945d..6eab82d 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> @@ -1484,8 +1484,18 @@ int kvm_handle_guest_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
> /* Synchronous External Abort? */
> if (kvm_vcpu_dabt_isextabt(vcpu)) {
> /*
> - * For RAS the host kernel may handle this abort.
> - * There is no need to pass the error into the guest.
> + * For RAS translation table walk abort, pass the error
> + * into the guest.
> + */
> + if (fault_status == FSC_SEA_TTW) {
> + kvm_inject_dabt(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_get_hfar(vcpu));
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * For RAS normal memory access abort, the host kernel may
> + * handle this abort. There is no need to pass the error into
> + * the guest.
> */
> if (!handle_guest_sea(fault_ipa, kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu)))
> return 1;
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-29 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-29 20:48 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: handle the translation table walk RAS error Dongjiu Geng
2017-11-29 13:22 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2017-11-30 11:32 ` gengdongjiu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171129132212.GA10563@lvm \
--to=cdall@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).