From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] arm64: deactivate saved ttbr when mm is deactivated
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:55:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171204165533.GI29619@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1512404606-26498-1-git-send-email-vinmenon@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 09:53:26PM +0530, Vinayak Menon wrote:
> A case is observed where a wrong physical address is read,
> resulting in a bus error and that happens soon after TTBR0 is
> set to the saved ttbr by uaccess_ttbr0_enable. This is always
> seen to happen in the exit path of the task.
>
> exception
> __arch_copy_from_user
> __copy_from_user
> probe_kernel_read
> get_freepointer_safe
> slab_alloc_node
> slab_alloc
> kmem_cache_alloc
> kmem_cache_zalloc
> fill_pool
> __debug_object_init
> debug_object_init
> rcuhead_fixup_activate
> debug_object_fixup
> debug_object_activate
> debug_rcu_head_queue
> __call_rcu
> ep_remove
> eventpoll_release_file
> __fput
> ____fput
> task_work_run
> do_exit
>
> The mm has been released and the pgd is freed, but probe_kernel_read
> invoked from slub results in call to __arch_copy_from_user. At the
> entry to __arch_copy_from_user, when SW PAN is enabled, this results
> in stale value being set to ttbr0. May be a speculative fetch aftwerwards
> is resulting in invalid physical address access.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>
> I have not tested this patch to see if it fixes the problem.
> Sending it early for comments.
I wonder whether it would be better to avoid restoring the user TTBR0 if
KERNEL_DS is set. We could do the same thing for PAN. Do we ever access
user addresses under KERNEL_DS?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-04 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-04 16:23 [RFC PATCH] arm64: deactivate saved ttbr when mm is deactivated Vinayak Menon
2017-12-04 16:55 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2017-12-04 17:30 ` Mark Rutland
2017-12-04 18:00 ` Mark Rutland
2017-12-05 5:00 ` Vinayak Menon
2017-12-05 11:06 ` Mark Rutland
2017-12-05 14:55 ` Will Deacon
2017-12-05 15:56 ` Vinayak Menon
2017-12-05 16:37 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171204165533.GI29619@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).