From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 10:10:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] clk: sunxi-ng: sun50i: a64: Add 2x fixed post-divider to MMC module clocks In-Reply-To: References: <20171204051912.7485-1-wens@csie.org> <20171204051912.7485-3-wens@csie.org> <20171205195956.xdil2dsbtfwx35jj@flea.lan> <20171206155608.tuw73ht6gq7hyrho@flea.lan> Message-ID: <20171207091042.fqoh7utt2ookqozj@flea.lan> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 12:10:39AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Maxime Ripard > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 10:30:26AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Maxime Ripard > >> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:19:12PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> >> On the A64, the MMC module clocks are fixed in the new timing mode, > >> >> i.e. they do not have a bit to select the mode. These clocks have > >> >> a 2x divider somewhere between the clock and the MMC module. > >> >> > >> >> To be consistent with other SoCs supporting the new timing mode, > >> >> we model the 2x divider as a fixed post-divider on the MMC module > >> >> clocks. > >> >> > >> >> This patch adds the post-dividers to the MMC clocks. > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > >> > > >> > I had a doubt applying that one... sorry. > >> > > >> >> --- > >> >> drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > >> >> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > >> >> > >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c > >> >> index 2bb4cabf802f..ee9c12cf3f08 100644 > >> >> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c > >> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c > >> >> @@ -400,28 +400,45 @@ static SUNXI_CCU_MP_WITH_MUX_GATE(nand_clk, "nand", mod0_default_parents, 0x080, > >> >> BIT(31), /* gate */ > >> >> 0); > >> >> > >> >> +/* > >> >> + * MMC clocks are the new timing mode (see A83T & H3) variety, but without > >> >> + * the mode switch. This means they have a 2x post divider between the clock > >> >> + * and the MMC module. This is not documented in the manual, but is taken > >> >> + * into consideration when setting the mmc module clocks in the BSP kernel. > >> >> + * Without it, MMC performance is degraded. > >> >> + * > >> >> + * We model it here to be consistent with other SoCs supporting this mode. > >> >> + * The alternative would be to add the 2x multiplier when setting the MMC > >> >> + * module clock in the MMC driver, just for the A64. > >> >> + */ > >> >> static const char * const mmc_default_parents[] = { "osc24M", "pll-periph0-2x", > >> >> "pll-periph1-2x" }; > >> >> -static SUNXI_CCU_MP_WITH_MUX_GATE(mmc0_clk, "mmc0", mmc_default_parents, 0x088, > >> >> - 0, 4, /* M */ > >> >> - 16, 2, /* P */ > >> >> - 24, 2, /* mux */ > >> >> - BIT(31), /* gate */ > >> >> - 0); > >> >> - > >> >> -static SUNXI_CCU_MP_WITH_MUX_GATE(mmc1_clk, "mmc1", mmc_default_parents, 0x08c, > >> >> - 0, 4, /* M */ > >> >> - 16, 2, /* P */ > >> >> - 24, 2, /* mux */ > >> >> - BIT(31), /* gate */ > >> >> - 0); > >> >> - > >> >> -static SUNXI_CCU_MP_WITH_MUX_GATE(mmc2_clk, "mmc2", mmc_default_parents, 0x090, > >> >> - 0, 4, /* M */ > >> >> - 16, 2, /* P */ > >> >> - 24, 2, /* mux */ > >> >> - BIT(31), /* gate */ > >> >> - 0); > >> >> +static SUNXI_CCU_MP_WITH_MUX_GATE_POSTDIV(mmc0_clk, "mmc0", > >> >> + mmc_default_parents, 0x088, > >> >> + 0, 4, /* M */ > >> >> + 16, 2, /* P */ > >> >> + 24, 2, /* mux */ > >> >> + BIT(31), /* gate */ > >> >> + 2, /* post-div */ > >> >> + 0); > >> >> + > >> >> +static SUNXI_CCU_MP_WITH_MUX_GATE_POSTDIV(mmc1_clk, "mmc1", > >> >> + mmc_default_parents, 0x08c, > >> >> + 0, 4, /* M */ > >> >> + 16, 2, /* P */ > >> >> + 24, 2, /* mux */ > >> >> + BIT(31), /* gate */ > >> >> + 2, /* post-div */ > >> >> + 0); > >> >> + > >> > > >> > Are you sure that the divider there for the non-eMMC clocks? Usually, > >> > the new mode is only here for the eMMC, so we would divide the rate by > >> > two in the non-eMMC case. > >> > >> The new mode is there for all MMC controllers. The other two MMC > >> controllers even have the old/new timing mode switch. In case you > >> forgot we have ".need_new_timings" set for the A64 compatible. > > > > But then, shouldn't we model them as such, using the work you did on > > the A83t clocks? > > On the A64, the clocks don't have the switch. Only the MMC controller > does. On the A83T, both do. Ah, right. I've applied both patches. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: