[PATCH v2 22/36] KVM: arm64: Prepare to handle traps on deferred VM sysregs

[christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)]

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 11:10:36AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 07/12/17 17:06, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > When we defer the save/restore of system registers to vcpu_load and
> > vcpu_put, we need to take care of the emulation code that handles traps
> > to these registers, since simply reading the memory array will return
> > stale data.
> > 
> > Therefore, introduce two functions to directly read/write the registers
> > from the physical CPU when we're on a VHE system that has loaded the
> > system registers onto the physical CPU.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > 
> > Notes:
> >     Changes since v1:
> >      - Removed spurious white space
> > 
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  4 +++
> >  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c         | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index de0d55b30b61..f6afe685a280 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -279,6 +279,10 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> >  
> >  	/* Detect first run of a vcpu */
> >  	bool has_run_once;
> > +
> > +	/* True when deferrable sysregs are loaded on the physical CPU,
> > +	 * see kvm_vcpu_load_sysregs and kvm_vcpu_put_sysregs. */
> > +	bool sysregs_loaded_on_cpu;
> >  };
> >  
> >  #define vcpu_gp_regs(v)		(&(v)->arch.ctxt.gp_regs)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > index 62c12ab9e6c4..80adbec933de 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> >  #include <asm/kvm_coproc.h>
> >  #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> >  #include <asm/kvm_host.h>
> > +#include <asm/kvm_hyp.h>
> >  #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
> >  #include <asm/perf_event.h>
> >  #include <asm/sysreg.h>
> > @@ -111,6 +112,54 @@ static bool access_dcsw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >  	return true;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static u64 read_deferrable_vm_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int reg)
> > +{
> > +	if (vcpu->arch.sysregs_loaded_on_cpu) {
> > +		switch (reg) {
> > +		case SCTLR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(sctlr);
> > +		case TTBR0_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(ttbr0);
> > +		case TTBR1_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(ttbr1);
> > +		case TCR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(tcr);
> > +		case ESR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(esr);
> > +		case FAR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(far);
> > +		case AFSR0_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(afsr0);
> > +		case AFSR1_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(afsr1);
> > +		case MAIR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(mair);
> > +		case AMAIR_EL1:		return read_sysreg_el1(amair);
> > +		case CONTEXTIDR_EL1:	return read_sysreg_el1(contextidr);
> > +		case DACR32_EL2:	return read_sysreg(dacr32_el2);
> > +		case IFSR32_EL2:	return read_sysreg(ifsr32_el2);
> > +		default:		BUG();
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void write_deferrable_vm_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int reg, u64 val)
> > +{
> > +	if (vcpu->arch.sysregs_loaded_on_cpu) {
> > +		switch (reg) {
> > +		case SCTLR_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, sctlr);	return;
> > +		case TTBR0_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, ttbr0);	return;
> > +		case TTBR1_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, ttbr1);	return;
> > +		case TCR_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, tcr);	return;
> > +		case ESR_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, esr);	return;
> > +		case FAR_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, far);	return;
> > +		case AFSR0_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, afsr0);	return;
> > +		case AFSR1_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, afsr1);	return;
> > +		case MAIR_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, mair);	return;
> > +		case AMAIR_EL1:		write_sysreg_el1(val, amair);	return;
> > +		case CONTEXTIDR_EL1:	write_sysreg_el1(val, contextidr); return;
> > +		case DACR32_EL2:	write_sysreg(val, dacr32_el2); return;
> > +		case IFSR32_EL2:	write_sysreg(val, ifsr32_el2); return;
> > +		default:		BUG();
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) = val;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Generic accessor for VM registers. Only called as long as HCR_TVM
> >   * is set. If the guest enables the MMU, we stop trapping the VM
> > @@ -133,14 +182,14 @@ static bool access_vm_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >  	if (!p->is_aarch32 || !p->is_32bit) {
> >  		val = p->regval;
> >  	} else {
> > -		val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg);
> > +		val = read_deferrable_vm_reg(vcpu, reg);
> >  		if (r->reg % 2)
> >  			val = (p->regval << 32) | (u64)lower_32_bits(val);
> >  		else
> >  			val = ((u64)upper_32_bits(val) << 32) |
> >  				(u64)lower_32_bits(p->regval);
> >  	}
> > -	vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) = val;
> > +	write_deferrable_vm_reg(vcpu, reg, val);
> >  
> >  	kvm_toggle_cache(vcpu, was_enabled);
> >  	return true;
> > 
> 
> I'm slightly uneasy with this. It means that the rest of the KVM code
> has to know whether a given register is deferrable or not (or face the
> wrath of the BUG). I'd be more inclined to hide the "loaded on cpu"
> magic in the vcpu_sys_reg() accessors.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 

Yes, this is the main reservation I also have with the series.

I did start out with a giant "rewrite everything to vcpu_get_sys_reg and
vcpu_get_sys_reg" which hides this logic, and we may want to go back to
that.

That does mean that we need a giant switch statement which knows how to
read any deferrable EL1 (and EL0) system register from hardware, and
still BUG/WARN if someone adds a system register but forgets to add that
handler and test on VHE.  Unless there's some fantastic auto-gen
mechanism that can take a hash define and figure out which sysreg
instruction to use - I couldn't think of that.

I'm happy to go back to that approach, but I didn't find it that much
nicer either.

How about I send you the small handful of patches that implement the
alternative approach and you have a look at that?

Thanks,
-Christoffer