From: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Paul E. McKenney)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: CPU hotplug: Delegate complete() to surviving CPU
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:36:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171212193602.GG7829@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171212173759.GE10595@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 05:37:59PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 09:20:59AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > The ARM implementation of arch_cpu_idle_dead() invokes complete(), but
> > does so after RCU has stopped watching the outgoing CPU, which results
> > in lockdep complaints because complete() invokes functions containing RCU
> > readers. This patch therefore uses Thomas Gleixner's trick of delegating
> > the complete() call to a surviving CPU via smp_call_function_single().
> >
> > Reported-by: Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com>
> > Reported-by: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Tested-by: Tested-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
> > Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> > Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
>
> As I just described in response to Fabio's testing, this doesn't solve
> anything if CONFIG_BL_SWITCHER is enabled. We could lose the unlock of
> a spinlock in the GIC code for sending the IPI. As I already said
> previously in our discussion (but I guess you just don't believe me):
Sorry, Russell, but most days I don't even believe myself. So it is
nothing personal, just one of the occupational hazards of being me.
> "2. there's some optional locking in the GIC driver that cause problems
> for the cpu dying path.
>
> The concensus last time around was that the IPI solution is a non-
> starter, so the seven year proven-reliable solution (disregarding the
> RCU warning) persists because I don't think anyone came up with a
> better solution."
>
> Using smp_call_function_single() invokes the IPI paths.
OK, another approach is to have the dying CPU simply set an in-memory
flag, which a surviving CPU polls for. There are of course any number
of ways of doing the polling loop.
So what bad thing happens when you use that approach?
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-12 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-12 17:20 [PATCH] ARM: CPU hotplug: Delegate complete() to surviving CPU Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-12 17:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-12-12 19:36 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-12-12 17:40 ` Baruch Siach
2017-12-12 19:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171212193602.GG7829@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).