From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 8/9] arm64: topology: Enable ACPI/PPTT based CPU topology.
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:22:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171213182219.GC4060@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171201222330.18863-9-jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Nit: remove the period in $SUBJECT and capitalize with a coherent
policy for the patches touching the same code.
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 04:23:29PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Propagate the topology information from the PPTT tree to the
> cpu_topology array. We can get the thread id, core_id and
> cluster_id by assuming certain levels of the PPTT tree correspond
> to those concepts. The package_id is flagged in the tree and can be
> found by calling find_acpi_cpu_topology_package() which terminates
> its search when it finds an ACPI node flagged as the physical
> package. If the tree doesn't contain enough levels to represent
> all of the requested levels then the root node will be returned
> for all subsequent levels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/topology.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> index 74a8a5173a35..198714aca9e8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> * for more details.
> */
>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/arch_topology.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> @@ -22,6 +23,7 @@
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/sched/topology.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
>
> #include <asm/cpu.h>
> @@ -300,6 +302,47 @@ static void __init reset_cpu_topology(void)
> }
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +/*
> + * Propagate the topology information of the processor_topology_node tree to the
> + * cpu_topology array.
> + */
> +static int __init parse_acpi_topology(void)
> +{
> + u64 is_threaded;
Nit: a bool would be preferable.
> + int cpu;
> + int topology_id;
int cpu, topology_id;
> + is_threaded = read_cpuid_mpidr() & MPIDR_MT_BITMASK;
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology(cpu, 0);
> + if (topology_id < 0)
> + return topology_id;
> +
> + if (is_threaded) {
> + cpu_topology[cpu].thread_id = topology_id;
> + topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology(cpu, 1);
> + cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = topology_id;
> + topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(cpu);
> + cpu_topology[cpu].physical_id = topology_id;
> + } else {
> + cpu_topology[cpu].thread_id = -1;
> + cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = topology_id;
> + topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(cpu);
> + cpu_topology[cpu].physical_id = topology_id;
> + }
> + }
Add a space.
It is probably my fault so apologies if that's the case. The
find_acpi_cpu_topology()
API is a bit strange since it behaves differently according to the
level passed in.
I think it is better to define two calls (it might well have been like
that in one of the previous series versions):
- find_acpi_cpu_package_level() (returns: package level if success, <0 on
failure)
- acpi_cpu_topology_id()
It would even be better to lump the two calls together but you do not
know how many topology levels are there so it becomes a bit complicated
to handle.
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +static int __init parse_acpi_topology(void)
static inline ?
> +{
> + /*ACPI kernels should be built with PPTT support*/
I think you can remove this comment.
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +#endif
>
> void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
> {
> @@ -309,6 +352,8 @@ void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
> * Discard anything that was parsed if we hit an error so we
> * don't use partial information.
> */
> - if (of_have_populated_dt() && parse_dt_topology())
> + if ((!acpi_disabled) && parse_acpi_topology())
> + reset_cpu_topology();
> + else if (of_have_populated_dt() && parse_dt_topology())
> reset_cpu_topology();
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h
> index cb0775e1ee4b..170ce87edd88 100644
> --- a/include/linux/topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/topology.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,8 @@
> if (nr_cpus_node(node))
>
> int arch_update_cpu_topology(void);
> +int find_acpi_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpu, int level);
> +int find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(unsigned int cpu);
I do not think these two declarations:
a) belong in this patch
b) belong in include/linux/topology.h (should be acpi.h)
Lorenzo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-13 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-01 22:23 [PATCH v5 0/9] Support PPTT for ARM64 Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] arm64/acpi: Create arch specific cpu to acpi id helper Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] ACPI/PPTT: Add Processor Properties Topology Table parsing Jeremy Linton
2017-12-12 1:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-01 22:23 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] ACPI: Enable PPTT support on ARM64 Jeremy Linton
2017-12-13 17:26 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-01-05 21:58 ` Jeremy Linton
2018-01-05 22:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-01 22:23 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] drivers: base cacheinfo: Add support for ACPI based firmware tables Jeremy Linton
2017-12-12 1:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-12 17:03 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-12 17:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-12 22:55 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-12 23:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-12 23:37 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-12 23:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-03 14:21 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-01-04 11:46 ` Sudeep Holla
2017-12-01 22:23 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] arm64: " Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] ACPI/PPTT: Add topology parsing code Jeremy Linton
2017-12-12 1:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-12 16:13 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-13 17:38 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-12-13 22:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-13 23:06 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-13 23:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-03 8:49 ` vkilari at codeaurora.org
2018-01-03 16:57 ` Jeremy Linton
2018-01-04 6:48 ` vkilari at codeaurora.org
2018-01-04 17:50 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] arm64: Topology, rename cluster_id Jeremy Linton
2017-12-13 18:02 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-12-15 16:36 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-18 12:42 ` Morten Rasmussen
2017-12-18 15:47 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-12-19 9:38 ` Morten Rasmussen
2018-01-02 2:29 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2018-01-02 11:30 ` Morten Rasmussen
2018-01-03 14:29 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-01-03 17:32 ` Jeremy Linton
2018-01-03 17:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-01-04 3:59 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2018-01-04 18:00 ` Jeremy Linton
2018-01-04 4:14 ` Xiongfeng Wang
2017-12-01 22:23 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] arm64: topology: Enable ACPI/PPTT based CPU topology Jeremy Linton
2017-12-13 18:22 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2017-12-15 17:42 ` Jeremy Linton
2017-12-01 22:23 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] ACPI: Add PPTT to injectable table list Jeremy Linton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171213182219.GC4060@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).