From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:32:22 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: ARM: Mediatek: Fix ethsys documentation In-Reply-To: References: <20171201120708.30129-1-matthias.bgg@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20171219013222.GZ7997@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12/14, Matthias Brugger wrote: > Hi Stephen, Michael, > > On 12/01/2017 01:07 PM, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > The ethsys registers a reset controller, so we need to specify a > > reset cell. This patch fixes the documentation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,ethsys.txt | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,ethsys.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,ethsys.txt > > index 7aa3fa167668..6cc7840ff37a 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,ethsys.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek/mediatek,ethsys.txt > > @@ -20,4 +20,5 @@ ethsys: clock-controller at 1b000000 { > > compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-ethsys", "syscon"; > > reg = <0 0x1b000000 0 0x1000>; > > #clock-cells = <1>; > > + #reset-cells = <1>; > > }; > > > > Will you take this patch through the clk tree, or shall I take it through my SoC > tree? > It's resets, we are clk maintainers. I'm clkfused. You can take it, along with my Acked-by: Stephen Boyd if you like/expect conflicts. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project