From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sam@ravnborg.org (Sam Ravnborg)
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 22:05:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/8] arch: enable relative relocations for arm64,
 power, x86, s390 and x86
In-Reply-To: <20171225205440.14575-2-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
References: <20171225205440.14575-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
 <20171225205440.14575-2-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20171225210502.GA635@ravnborg.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Ard.

On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 08:54:33PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Before updating certain subsystems to use place relative 32-bit
> relocations in special sections, to save space  and reduce the
> number of absolute relocations that need to be processed at runtime
> by relocatable kernels, introduce the Kconfig symbol and define it
> for some architectures that should be able to support and benefit
> from it.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: x86 at kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/Kconfig                    | 10 ++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig              |  1 +

>  arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S |  2 +-
The change to arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S is
not justified in the changelog.
Did you add it by mistake?

	Sam