From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pavel@ucw.cz (Pavel Machek) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 17:30:22 +0100 Subject: v4.15: camera problems on n900 In-Reply-To: <20171229093855.hz44vpssb5mufzop@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> References: <20171227210543.GA19719@amd> <20171227211718.favif66afztygfje@kekkonen.localdomain> <20171228202453.GA20142@amd> <20171229093855.hz44vpssb5mufzop@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> Message-ID: <20171229163022.GA31142@amd> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri 2017-12-29 11:38:55, Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 09:24:53PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Wed 2017-12-27 23:17:19, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:05:43PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > In v4.14, back camera on N900 works. On v4.15-rc1.. it works for few > > > > seconds, but then I get repeated oopses. > > > > > > > > On v4.15-rc0.5 (commit ed30b147e1f6e396e70a52dbb6c7d66befedd786), > > > > camera does not start. > > > > > > > > Any ideas what might be wrong there? > > > > > > What kind of oopses do you get? > > > > Hmm. bisect pointed to commit that can't be responsible.... Ideas > > welcome. > > Hi Pavel, > > I tested N9 and capture appears to be working from the CSI-2 receiver > (media tree master, i.e. v4.15-rc3 now). > > Which pipeline did you use? I'm using the "main" sensor (5MPx) and am using capture (not preview) pipeline. I tested linux-next in the meantime, and that one seems to work. (Which is strange, I believe it oopsed before. Perhaps something random?) With linux-next working, it should not be hardto figure out what is going on. Thanks, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: