From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] PCI: mediatek: Set up class type and vendor ID for MT7622
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 10:56:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180102105659.GB10536@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1514425152.25872.39.camel@mhfsdcap03>
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 09:39:12AM +0800, Honghui Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-12-27 at 12:45 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 08:59:54AM +0800, honghui.zhang at mediatek.com wrote:
> > > From: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@mediatek.com>
> > >
> > > The hardware default value of IDs and class type is not correct,
> > > fix that by setup the correct values before start up.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Honghui Zhang <honghui.zhang@mediatek.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/pci_ids.h | 2 ++
> > > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c
> > > index fc29a9a..62aac0ea 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-mediatek.c
> > > @@ -74,6 +74,10 @@
> > >
> > > /* PCIe V2 per-port registers */
> > > #define PCIE_MSI_VECTOR 0x0c0
> > > +
> > > +#define PCIE_CONF_ID 0x100
> > > +#define PCIE_CONF_CLASS 0x104
> > > +
> > > #define PCIE_INT_MASK 0x420
> > > #define INTX_MASK GENMASK(19, 16)
> > > #define INTX_SHIFT 16
> > > @@ -393,6 +397,14 @@ static int mtk_pcie_startup_port_v2(struct mtk_pcie_port *port)
> > > val |= PCIE_CSR_LTSSM_EN(port->slot) |
> > > PCIE_CSR_ASPM_L1_EN(port->slot);
> > > writel(val, pcie->base + PCIE_SYS_CFG_V2);
> > > +
> > > + /* Set up vendor ID and device ID for MT7622*/
> > > + val = PCI_VENDOR_ID_MEDIATEK;
> > > + writel(val, port->base + PCIE_CONF_ID);
> > > +
> > > + /* Set up class code for MT7622 */
> > > + val = PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI << 16;
> > > + writel(val, port->base + PCIE_CONF_CLASS);
> >
> > 1) Your comments mention MT7622 specifically, but this code is run for
> > both mt2712-pcie and mt7622-pcie. If this code is safe and necessary
> > for both mt2712-pcie and mt7622-pcie, please remove the mention of
> > MT7622.
>
> Hmm, the code snippet added here will only be executed by MT7622, since
> MT2712 will not enter this "if (pcie->base) {" condition.
> Should the mention of MT7622 must be removed in this case?
You should add an explicit way (eg of_device_is_compatible() match for
instance) to apply the quirk just on the platform that requires it.
Checking for "if (pcie->base)" is really not the way to do it.
> > 2) The first comment mentions both "vendor ID and device ID" but you
> > don't write the device ID. Since this code applies to both
> > mt2712-pcie and mt7622-pcie, my guess is that you don't *want* to
> > write the device ID. If that's the case, please fix the comment.
> >
>
> My bad, I did not check the comments carefully.
> Thanks.
>
> > 3) If you only need to set the vendor ID, you're performing a 32-bit
> > write (writel()) to update a 16-bit value. Please use writew()
> > instead.
> >
>
> Ok, thanks, I guess I could use the following code snippet in the next
> version:
> val = readl(port->base + PCIE_CONF_VENDOR_ID)
> val &= ~GENMASK(15, 0);
> val |= PCI_VENDOR_ID_MEDIATEK;
> writel(val, port->base + PCIE_CONF_VENDOR_ID);
Have you read Bjorn's comment ? Or there is a problem with using
a writew() ?
Lorenzo
> > 4) If you only need to set the vendor ID, please use a definition like
> > "PCIE_CONF_VENDOR_ID" instead of the ambiguous "PCIE_CONF_ID".
> >
> > 5) If you only need to set the vendor ID, please update the changelog
> > to mention "vendor ID" specifically instead of the ambiguous "IDs".
>
> > 6) Please add a space before the closing "*/" of the first comment.
> >
> > 7) PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI is for a PCI-to-PCI bridge, i.e., one that has
> > PCI on both the primary (upstream) side and the secondary (downstream)
> > side. That kind of bridge has a type 1 config header (see
> > PCI_HEADER_TYPE) and the PCI_PRIMARY_BUS and PCI_SECONDARY_BUS
> > registers tell us the bus number of the primary and secondary sides.
> >
> > I don't believe this device is a PCI-to-PCI bridge. I think it's a
> > *host* bridge that has some non-PCI interface on the upstream side and
> > should have a type 0 config header. If that's the case you should use
> > PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST instead.
> >
>
> Thanks very much for your help with the review, I will fix the other
> issue in the next version.
>
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* Assert all reset signals */
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> > > index ab20dc5..2480b0e 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> > > @@ -2113,6 +2113,8 @@
> > >
> > > #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_MYRICOM 0x14c1
> > >
> > > +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_MEDIATEK 0x14c3
> > > +
> > > #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_TITAN 0x14D2
> > > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_TITAN_010L 0x8001
> > > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_TITAN_100L 0x8010
> > > --
> > > 2.6.4
> > >
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-02 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-27 0:59 [PATCH v5 0/2] PCI: mediatek: Fixups for the IRQ handle routine and MT7622's class code honghui.zhang at mediatek.com
2017-12-27 0:59 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] PCI: mediatek: Clear IRQ status after IRQ dispatched to avoid reentry honghui.zhang at mediatek.com
2018-01-04 18:40 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-01-04 19:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-01-05 11:51 ` Honghui Zhang
2018-01-05 17:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-03-16 11:22 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-12-27 0:59 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] PCI: mediatek: Set up class type and vendor ID for MT7622 honghui.zhang at mediatek.com
2017-12-27 18:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-12-28 1:39 ` Honghui Zhang
2018-01-02 10:56 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2018-01-03 6:39 ` Honghui Zhang
2018-01-03 12:15 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-03-16 12:15 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-03-16 12:13 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180102105659.GB10536@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).