From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: graeme.gregory@linaro.org (graeme.gregory at linaro.org) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 11:16:11 +0000 Subject: [net-next: PATCH v2 5/5] net: mvpp2: enable ACPI support in the driver In-Reply-To: <20171231192354.GB20455@lunn.ch> References: <1514721520-18964-1-git-send-email-mw@semihalf.com> <1514721520-18964-6-git-send-email-mw@semihalf.com> <20171231192354.GB20455@lunn.ch> Message-ID: <20180103111611.GB21230@xora-haswell> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 08:23:54PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > * Modify way of obtaining interrupts - with ACPI they are resources > > bound to struct platform_device and it's not possible to obtain > > them directly from the child node. Hence a formula is used, depending > > on the port_id and number of possible CPUs. > > Hi Marcin > > I know nothing about ACPI. Is this limitation with respect to > interrupts fundamental to ACPI, or just that nobody has implemented > flexible interrupt support yet? > The infrastructure is there to traverse trees of children, but I don't think there any helper functions. Graeme -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: