From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] arm64: dts: marvell: use SPDX-License-Identifier for Armada SoCs
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 13:40:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180105134046.12915b36@windsurf.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180105115329.1233-2-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Hello,
On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 12:53:23 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Follow the recent trend for the license description, and also fix the
> wrongly stated X11 to MIT.
>
> As already pointed on the DT ML, the X11 license text [1] is explicitly
> for the X Consortium and has a couple of extra clauses. The MIT
> license text [2] is actually what the current DT files claim.
>
> [1] https://spdx.org/licenses/X11.html
> [2] https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-371x.dtsi | 38 +-------------------
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-372x.dtsi | 38 +-------------------
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-37xx.dtsi | 38 +-------------------
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-7020.dtsi | 41 +---------------------
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-7040.dtsi | 41 +---------------------
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-70x0.dtsi | 41 +---------------------
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-8020.dtsi | 41 +---------------------
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-8040.dtsi | 41 +---------------------
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-8080.dtsi | 41 +---------------------
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-80x0.dtsi | 41 +---------------------
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806-dual.dtsi | 41 +---------------------
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806-quad.dtsi | 41 +---------------------
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap806.dtsi | 41 +---------------------
> .../dts/marvell/armada-ap810-ap0-octa-core.dtsi | 41 +---------------------
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-ap810-ap0.dtsi | 41 +---------------------
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-common.dtsi | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-cp110.dtsi | 6 ++--
> 17 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 596 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-371x.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-371x.dtsi
> index 11226f7b9ed9..dc1182ec9fa1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-371x.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/armada-371x.dtsi
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
The previous license was GPL-2.0+ or X11, not GPL-2.0+ or MIT. Any
reason to change from X11 to MIT ?
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-05 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-05 11:53 [PATCH 0/7] use SPDX-License-Identifier for Armada SoCs and boards Gregory CLEMENT
2018-01-05 11:53 ` [PATCH 1/7] arm64: dts: marvell: use SPDX-License-Identifier for Armada SoCs Gregory CLEMENT
2018-01-05 12:40 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2018-01-05 12:45 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2018-01-05 12:52 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-01-05 14:38 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-01-05 14:55 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-01-05 15:30 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-01-08 15:27 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2018-01-05 11:53 ` [PATCH 2/7] arm64: dts: marvell: armada-3720-db: use SPDX-License-Identifier Gregory CLEMENT
2018-01-05 11:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] arm64: dts: marvell: armada-3720-espressobin: " Gregory CLEMENT
2018-01-05 11:53 ` [PATCH 4/7] arm64: dts: marvell: armada-7040-db: " Gregory CLEMENT
2018-01-05 11:53 ` [PATCH 5/7] arm64: dts: marvell: armada-8040-db: " Gregory CLEMENT
2018-01-05 11:53 ` [PATCH 6/7] arm64: dts: marvell: armada-8040-mcbin: " Gregory CLEMENT
2018-01-05 11:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm64: dts: marvell: armada-8080-db: " Gregory CLEMENT
2018-01-05 11:58 ` [PATCH 0/7] use SPDX-License-Identifier for Armada SoCs and boards Gregory CLEMENT
2018-02-14 12:24 ` Gregory CLEMENT
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180105134046.12915b36@windsurf.lan \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).