From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mst@redhat.com (Michael S. Tsirkin) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 13:30:52 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v1 01/16] virtio: Validate queue pfn for 32bit transports In-Reply-To: References: <20180109190414.4017-1-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> <20180109190414.4017-2-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> <20180110012429-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20180110130230-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Message-ID: <20180110132930-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:19:34AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 10 January 2018 at 11:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > For virtio-mmio? I don't seem to see that code in > > hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c > > For example I still see handling for VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUE_PFN > > there, and no handling for VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUE_DESC_LOW > > and such. > > Are there uses that make it worthwhile to get virtio-1 > support added to virtio-mmio, rather than just getting > people to move over to virtio-pci instead ? > > thanks > -- PMM I keep getting these patches (like the one that started this thread) so I think yes. If nothing else the guest support will bit-rot without an open-source implementation. -- MST