From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:21:52 +0530 Subject: [PATCH V5 00/13] drivers: Boot Constraint core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20180111095152.GI3626@vireshk-i7> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10-01-18, 10:54, Olof Johansson wrote: > The SoC-specific pieces should preferrably go under drivers/soc > instead, to reduce cross-tree dependencies when introducing new SoC > variants. > > They're more related to the SoC than to the boot_constraint framework anyway. Hmm, okay. > Bikeshed: We've traditionally had really terse and precise names under > drivers/. This is the first verbose one with a _ in it. Maybe find a > shorter name or just concatenate to 'bootconstraints'? We didn't call > it remote_proc or rapid_io, etc, either. :) Sure. -- viresh