From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: davem@davemloft.net (David Miller)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 09:35:25 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [net-next: PATCH v4 0/7] Armada 7k/8k PP2 ACPI support
In-Reply-To: <CAPv3WKeqEd6Hcy0NdPpiVVA1ioUYY4zs_0zai2gwkCPtM1yaJg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1516278704-17141-1-git-send-email-mw@semihalf.com>
 <20180118132322.GE2690@kwain>
 <CAPv3WKeqEd6Hcy0NdPpiVVA1ioUYY4zs_0zai2gwkCPtM1yaJg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20180122.093525.1549534484738907077.davem@davemloft.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

From: Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:00:37 +0100

> There's a discussion about the ACPI vs generic MDIO/PHY change under
> initial version of the patchset, however the patches in question were
> for now abandoned from further re-sends.

But doesn't the results of that discussion determine whether the way ACPI
is being used in this patch series is what we want to do or not?