[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: at24: sort manufacturers alphabetically

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: at24: sort manufacturers alphabetically

[Rob Herring]

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 05:06:15PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Makes them easier to find.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

This one should go into 4.16. I can apply after rc1 or apply to tree 
with at24.txt changes queued.

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Rob

[PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: at24: add compatible for nxp,se97b

[Rob Herring]

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 05:06:16PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
> The datasheet talks about the chip being an spd, but the chip is writable
> so atmel,24c02 is more appropriate as fallback.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: at24: sort manufacturers alphabetically

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

2018-01-29 17:17 GMT+01:00 Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 05:06:15PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Makes them easier to find.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> This one should go into 4.16. I can apply after rc1 or apply to tree
> with at24.txt changes queued.
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>
> Rob

Wolfram,

can you take this via the i2c tree for 4.16?

Thanks,
Bartosz

[PATCH 3/4] ARM: dts: at91: nattis: use the correct compatible for the eeprom

[Alexandre Belloni]

On 16/01/2018 at 17:06:17 +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
> The used part does contain an eeprom compatible with an Atmel 24c02
> chip and it is from NXP, but it is not called 24c02. It's actually a
> se97b chip. Adjust the compatible accordingly.
> 
> Fixes: 0e4323899973 ("ARM: dts: at91: add devicetree for the Axentia Nattis with Natte power")
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-nattis-2-natte-2.dts | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
Applied, thanks.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[PATCH 4/4] ARM: dts: at91: tse850: use the correct compatible for the eeprom

[Alexandre Belloni]

On 16/01/2018 at 17:06:18 +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
> The used part does contain an eeprom compatible with an Atmel 24c02
> chip and it is from NXP, but it is not called 24c02. It's actually a
> se97b chip. Adjust the compatible accordingly.
> 
> Fixes: 21dd0ece34c2 ("ARM: dts: at91: add devicetree for the Axentia TSE-850")
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-tse850-3.dts | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
Applied, thanks.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: at24: sort manufacturers alphabetically

[Wolfram Sang]

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 05:56:52PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> 2018-01-29 17:17 GMT+01:00 Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>:
> > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 05:06:15PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
> >> Makes them easier to find.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > This one should go into 4.16. I can apply after rc1 or apply to tree
> > with at24.txt changes queued.
> >
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> >
> > Rob
> 
> Wolfram,
> 
> can you take this via the i2c tree for 4.16?

I missed this mail because I leave at24 patches to you now.
Please send pull requests for patches I shall take. Least room for
confusion (I hope).

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180221/bcb9d069/attachment.sig>

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: at24: sort manufacturers alphabetically

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

2018-02-21 10:11 GMT+01:00 Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 05:56:52PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> 2018-01-29 17:17 GMT+01:00 Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>:
>> > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 05:06:15PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> >> Makes them easier to find.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
>> >> ---
>> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 2 +-
>> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > This one should go into 4.16. I can apply after rc1 or apply to tree
>> > with at24.txt changes queued.
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>> >
>> > Rob
>>
>> Wolfram,
>>
>> can you take this via the i2c tree for 4.16?
>
> I missed this mail because I leave at24 patches to you now.
> Please send pull requests for patches I shall take. Least room for
> confusion (I hope).
>

Will do. What about this (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/867169/)
one? It's part of a bigger series, do you want me to apply it to my
tree and provide you with an immutable branch?

Bart

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: at24: sort manufacturers alphabetically

[Wolfram Sang]

> Will do. What about this (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/867169/)
> one? It's part of a bigger series, do you want me to apply it to my
> tree and provide you with an immutable branch?

Well, I would accept it for 4.16 using the "plain new id" rule. So, if
you add it on top of Peter's sorting patch, totally fine by me.

If you want it in v4.17, ok, too. I'd think an immutable branch is not
needed. There is a fallback property in the DTS. So at worst, there will
be a DTS warning during the merge window which will be fixed at rc1 time.

Unless I overlooked something.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180221/cc305d42/attachment.sig>

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: at24: sort manufacturers alphabetically

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

2018-02-21 10:40 GMT+01:00 Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>:
>
>> Will do. What about this (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/867169/)
>> one? It's part of a bigger series, do you want me to apply it to my
>> tree and provide you with an immutable branch?
>
> Well, I would accept it for 4.16 using the "plain new id" rule. So, if
> you add it on top of Peter's sorting patch, totally fine by me.
>
> If you want it in v4.17, ok, too. I'd think an immutable branch is not
> needed. There is a fallback property in the DTS. So at worst, there will
> be a DTS warning during the merge window which will be fixed at rc1 time.
>
> Unless I overlooked something.
>

Ok, I'll have some time during the weekend, so I'll send a PR for rc3.

Bart

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: at24: sort manufacturers alphabetically

[Wolfram Sang]

> Ok, I'll have some time during the weekend, so I'll send a PR for rc3.

Well, I am away this weekend, so I just sent out my pull request. But we
can make it for rc4, no problem.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180223/fe5ffb48/attachment.sig>

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: at24: sort manufacturers alphabetically

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

2018-02-23 11:32 GMT+01:00 Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>:
>
>> Ok, I'll have some time during the weekend, so I'll send a PR for rc3.
>
> Well, I am away this weekend, so I just sent out my pull request. But we
> can make it for rc4, no problem.
>

Yeah, I actually meant rc4.

Bart

[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: at24: sort manufacturers alphabetically

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

2018-01-16 17:06 GMT+01:00 Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>:
> Makes them easier to find.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt
> index 1812c848e369..abfae1beca2b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt
> @@ -38,9 +38,9 @@ Required properties:
>
>                  "catalyst",
>                  "microchip",
> +                "nxp",
>                  "ramtron",
>                  "renesas",
> -                "nxp",
>                  "st",
>
>                  Some vendors use different model names for chips which are just
> --
> 2.11.0
>

Applied to for-current. Thanks.

[PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: at24: add compatible for nxp,se97b

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

2018-01-16 17:06 GMT+01:00 Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>:
> The datasheet talks about the chip being an spd, but the chip is writable
> so atmel,24c02 is more appropriate as fallback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt
> index abfae1beca2b..edf9247613f6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.txt
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ Required properties:
>                  Some vendors use different model names for chips which are just
>                  variants of the above. Known such exceptions are listed below:
>
> +                "nxp,se97b" - the fallback is "atmel,24c02",
>                  "renesas,r1ex24002" - the fallback is "atmel,24c02"
>
>    - reg: The I2C address of the EEPROM.
> --
> 2.11.0
>

Applied to for-next, thanks.

Bart