From: Dave.Martin@arm.com (Dave Martin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Handling of chars received while a UART is not open
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:45:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180131134514.GO5862@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180131121931.GH9418@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:19:31PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:06:29PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Question:
> >
> > 1) Should a UART definitely discard the RX FIFO on ->startup()?
>
> Yes; POSIX makes no guarantees about the configuration of the port
> while it is closed, and when it is re-opened, it is permitted that
> the port is reset back to a set of default parameters rather than
> the previous parameter set that was configured.
>
> You also have the CREAD flag which indicates whether we want the
> receiver enabled or not, but it is not defined by POSIX whether the
> receiver remains enabled when the port is closed.
>
> Linux behaviour has always been to flush the port of received
> characters at close and open time (see 8250 driver), meaning that
> characters received while the TTY is closed are ignored - just like
> what happens on the physical console keyboard, which is also a TTY.
> Doing otherwise is likely to confuse applications and potentially
> introduce buggy behaviour that would only be detected on UARTs with
> differing behaviour to 8250.
>
> Linux follows POSIX General Terminal Interface for its TTY handling.
OK, that all sounds good.
Explicitly reading the RX FIFO until empty on startup seems compatible
with this, and harmless even on hardware that can't show the lockup.
I'll cook up another patch.
Cheers
---Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-31 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-31 12:06 Handling of chars received while a UART is not open Dave Martin
2018-01-31 12:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-01-31 13:45 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2018-01-31 13:12 ` Peter Maydell
2018-01-31 13:32 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180131134514.GO5862@e103592.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox