From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 5/8] arm_pmu: acpi: check for mismatched PPIs
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 16:41:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180205164202.26502-6-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180205164202.26502-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
The arm_pmu platform code explicitly checks for mismatched PPIs at probe
time, while the ACPI code leaves this to the core code. Future
refactoring will make this difficult for the core code to check, so
let's have the ACPI code check this explicitly.
As before, upon a failure we'll continue on without an interrupt. Ho
hum.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 17 ++++-------------
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c | 7 -------
3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index 4f73c5e8d623..ddcabd6a5d52 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -543,19 +543,7 @@ int armpmu_request_irq(struct arm_pmu *armpmu, int cpu)
if (!irq)
return 0;
- if (irq_is_percpu_devid(irq) && cpumask_empty(&armpmu->active_irqs)) {
- err = request_percpu_irq(irq, handler, "arm-pmu",
- &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
- } else if (irq_is_percpu_devid(irq)) {
- int other_cpu = cpumask_first(&armpmu->active_irqs);
- int other_irq = per_cpu(hw_events->irq, other_cpu);
-
- if (irq != other_irq) {
- pr_warn("mismatched PPIs detected.\n");
- err = -EINVAL;
- goto err_out;
- }
- } else {
+ if (!irq_is_percpu_devid(irq)) {
unsigned long irq_flags;
err = irq_force_affinity(irq, cpumask_of(cpu));
@@ -572,6 +560,9 @@ int armpmu_request_irq(struct arm_pmu *armpmu, int cpu)
err = request_irq(irq, handler, irq_flags, "arm-pmu",
per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, cpu));
+ } else if (cpumask_empty(&armpmu->active_irqs)) {
+ err = request_percpu_irq(irq, handler, "arm-pmu",
+ &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
}
if (err)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
index 30c5f2bbce59..09a1a36cff57 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/irqdesc.h>
#include <linux/percpu.h>
#include <linux/perf/arm_pmu.h>
@@ -140,6 +142,35 @@ static struct arm_pmu *arm_pmu_acpi_find_alloc_pmu(void)
}
/*
+ * Check whether the new IRQ is compatible with those already associated with
+ * the PMU (e.g. we don't have mismatched PPIs).
+ */
+static bool pmu_irq_matches(struct arm_pmu *pmu, int irq)
+{
+ struct pmu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = pmu->hw_events;
+ int cpu;
+
+ if (!irq)
+ return true;
+
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, &pmu->supported_cpus) {
+ int other_irq = per_cpu(hw_events->irq, cpu);
+ if (!other_irq)
+ continue;
+
+ if (irq == other_irq)
+ continue;
+ if (!irq_is_percpu_devid(irq) && !irq_is_percpu_devid(other_irq))
+ continue;
+
+ pr_warn("mismatched PPIs detected\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+/*
* This must run before the common arm_pmu hotplug logic, so that we can
* associate a CPU and its interrupt before the common code tries to manage the
* affinity and so on.
@@ -164,18 +195,21 @@ static int arm_pmu_acpi_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu)
if (!pmu)
return -ENOMEM;
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &pmu->supported_cpus);
-
per_cpu(probed_pmus, cpu) = pmu;
+ if (pmu_irq_matches(pmu, irq)) {
+ hw_events = pmu->hw_events;
+ per_cpu(hw_events->irq, cpu) = irq;
+ }
+
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &pmu->supported_cpus);
+
/*
* Log and request the IRQ so the core arm_pmu code can manage it. In
* some situations (e.g. mismatched PPIs), we may fail to request the
* IRQ. However, it may be too late for us to do anything about it.
* The common ARM PMU code will log a warning in this case.
*/
- hw_events = pmu->hw_events;
- per_cpu(hw_events->irq, cpu) = irq;
armpmu_request_irq(pmu, cpu);
/*
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
index 244558cfdbce..1dc3c1f574e0 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c
@@ -127,13 +127,6 @@ static int pmu_parse_irqs(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
pdev->dev.of_node);
}
- /*
- * Some platforms have all PMU IRQs OR'd into a single IRQ, with a
- * special platdata function that attempts to demux them.
- */
- if (dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev))
- cpumask_setall(&pmu->supported_cpus);
-
for (i = 0; i < num_irqs; i++) {
int cpu, irq;
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-05 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-05 16:41 [PATCHv2 0/8] arm_pmu: fix lockdep issues with ACPI systems Mark Rutland
2018-02-05 16:41 ` [PATCHv2 1/8] ARM: ux500: remove PMU IRQ bouncer Mark Rutland
2018-02-05 19:05 ` Linus Walleij
2018-02-06 11:26 ` Mark Rutland
2018-02-05 16:41 ` [PATCHv2 2/8] arm_pmu: kill arm_pmu_platdata Mark Rutland
2018-02-05 16:41 ` [PATCHv2 3/8] arm_pmu: fold platform helpers into platform code Mark Rutland
2018-02-05 16:41 ` [PATCHv2 4/8] arm_pmu: add armpmu_alloc_atomic() Mark Rutland
2018-02-05 16:41 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2018-02-05 16:42 ` [PATCHv2 6/8] arm_pmu: explicitly enable/disable SPIs at hotplug Mark Rutland
2018-02-26 15:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-02-26 15:22 ` Will Deacon
2018-02-26 15:56 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-02-26 16:01 ` Mark Rutland
2018-02-05 16:42 ` [PATCHv2 7/8] arm_pmu: note IRQs and PMUs per-cpu Mark Rutland
2018-02-05 17:07 ` Robin Murphy
2018-02-05 17:13 ` Mark Rutland
2018-02-14 13:11 ` Will Deacon
2018-02-14 13:24 ` Mark Rutland
2018-02-14 13:26 ` Will Deacon
2018-02-14 13:45 ` Mark Rutland
2018-02-14 18:22 ` Mark Rutland
2018-02-05 16:42 ` [PATCHv2 8/8] arm_pmu: acpi: request IRQs up-front Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180205164202.26502-6-mark.rutland@arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).