From: mylene.josserand@bootlin.com (Mylène Josserand)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 6/7] arm: dts: sun8i: a83t: Fix undefined offset with virtual timer
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 10:30:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180222103015.40249fee@dell-desktop.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <823f256a-3240-7bb4-cc0b-711108f3076c@arm.com>
Hi Marc,
Thank you for the review!
On Tue, 20 Feb 2018 18:07:54 +0000
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi Myl?ne,
>
> On 19/02/18 08:18, Myl?ne Josserand wrote:
> > The ARM architected timers use an offset between their physical and
> > virtual counters. That offset should be configured by the bootloader
> > in CNTVOFF.
> >
> > However, the A83t bootloader fails to do so, and we end up with an
> > undefined offset (which in our case is random), meaning that each CPU
> > will have a different time, which isn't working very well.
> >
> > Fix that by setting the arm,cpu-registers-not-fw-configured that will
> > make Linux use the physical timers instead of the virtual ones. One
> > possible side effect would be that the virtualization features would
> > be disabled. However, due to the way the GIC has been integrated in
> > the system, it is already unusable so we're effectively not losing any
> > feature.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Myl?ne Josserand <mylene.josserand@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
> > index e97a6d17b8d0..b9bdb891cf2f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-a83t.dtsi
> > @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@
> > <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> > <GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
> > <GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(8) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;
> > + arm,cpu-registers-not-fw-configured;
> > };
> >
> > clocks {
> >
>
> Is the firmware dropping you in the kernel in secure or non-secure mode?
For sun8i-a83t, the kernel is in secure mode.
>
> If the later, what you have is the only solution. If the former, that
> I'd suggest you adopt what we already have for the Renesas stuff (see
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/headsmp-apmu.S and commit 3fd45a136ff6).
>
> It would allow you to use the virtual timer as intended.
Okay, thanks for the commit pointed, I will try to adopt what it is done
for Renesas.
Best regards,
--
Myl?ne Josserand, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-22 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-19 8:18 [PATCH v3 0/7] Add SMP support on sun8i-a83t Mylène Josserand
2018-02-19 8:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] ARM: sun8i: smp: Add support for A83T Mylène Josserand
2018-02-19 9:04 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-02-19 10:39 ` Mylène Josserand
2018-02-20 3:32 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2018-02-22 7:47 ` Mylène Josserand
2018-02-19 8:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add CPUCFG device node for A83T dtsi Mylène Josserand
2018-02-19 8:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add PRCM device node for the " Mylène Josserand
2018-02-19 8:48 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-02-19 10:42 ` Mylène Josserand
2018-02-19 8:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] ARM: dts: sun8i: Add R_CPUCFG " Mylène Josserand
2018-02-19 8:18 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] arm: dts: sun8i: a83t: Add CCI-400 node Mylène Josserand
2018-02-19 8:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-02-19 10:43 ` Mylène Josserand
2018-02-19 8:18 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] arm: dts: sun8i: a83t: Fix undefined offset with virtual timer Mylène Josserand
2018-02-19 8:52 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-02-19 10:44 ` Mylène Josserand
2018-02-20 18:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-02-22 9:30 ` Mylène Josserand [this message]
2018-02-19 8:18 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] ARM: sun8i: smp: Remove the disabling of CPU0 Mylène Josserand
2018-02-19 8:54 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-02-19 10:50 ` Mylène Josserand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180222103015.40249fee@dell-desktop.home \
--to=mylene.josserand@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).