public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave.Martin@arm.com (Dave Martin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] signal: Add FPE_FLTUNK si_code for undiagnosable fp exceptions
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 13:13:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180222131333.GD32331@e103592.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5A8EB419.1020508@arm.com>

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:14:17PM +0000, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> On 21/02/18 16:02, Dave Martin wrote:
> > Some architectures cannot always report accurately what kind of
> > floating-point exception triggered a floating-point exception trap.
> > 
> > This can occur with fp exceptions occuring on lanes in a vector
> 
> (Nit: occurring)
> 
> > instruction on arm64 for example.
> > 
> > Rather than have every architecture come up with its own way of
> > descrbing such a condition, this patch adds a common FPE_FLTUNK do
> 
> (Nits: describing; 'to report')
> 
> > report that an fp exception caused a trap but we cannot be certain

Hmmm, this wasn't my best effort...

> > which kind of fp exception it was.
> 
> 
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
> > index 85dc965..10304de 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
> > @@ -229,7 +229,8 @@ typedef struct siginfo {
> >  # define __FPE_INVASC	12	/* invalid ASCII digit */
> >  # define __FPE_INVDEC	13	/* invalid decimal digit */
> >  #endif
> > -#define NSIGFPE		13
> > +#define FPE_FLTUNK	14	/* undiagnosed floating-point exception */
> > +#define NSIGFPE		14
> 
> It looks like x86's compat relies on this value not changing:
> | arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c:        BUILD_BUG_ON(NSIGFPE  != 13);
> | include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h:#define NSIGFPE              13
> 
> (from v4.16-rc2)

Hmmm, that's embarrassing -- thanks for spotting!

I think we can justifiably bump the number there, since x86 won't use
FPT_FLTUNK (for now, perhaps for ever) and anyway it doesn't add any new
information to siginfo.

I'll respin with these changes.

Cheers
---Dave

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-22 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-21 16:02 [PATCH 0/3] arm64: Fix invalid si_codes for fault signals Dave Martin
2018-02-21 16:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] signal: Add FPE_FLTUNK si_code for undiagnosable fp exceptions Dave Martin
2018-02-22 12:14   ` James Morse
2018-02-22 13:13     ` Dave Martin [this message]
2018-02-21 16:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: fpsimd: Fix bad si_code for undiagnosed SIGFPE Dave Martin
2018-02-21 16:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: signal: Ensure si_code is valid for all fault signals Dave Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180222131333.GD32331@e103592.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=dave.martin@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox