public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Philipp Rudo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 03/13] kexec_file, x86, powerpc: factor out kexec_file_ops functions
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:17:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180226121718.3432bbd6@ThinkPad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180222111732.23051-4-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>

Hi AKASHI

On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 20:17:22 +0900
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> wrote:

[...]

> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> index 990adae52151..a6d14a768b3e 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> @@ -26,34 +26,83 @@
>  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>  #include "kexec_internal.h"
> 
> +const __weak struct kexec_file_ops * const kexec_file_loaders[] = {NULL};
> +

Having a weak definition of kexec_file_loaders causes trouble on s390 with 
gcc 4.8 (newer versions seem to work fine). For me it looks like that in this
version gcc doesn't recognize __weak but use the default value for
optimization. This leads to _kexec_kernel_image_probe to always return ENOEXEC
because the for-loop gets optimized out.

The problem can easily be worked around by declaring kexec_file_loaders in
include/linux/kexec.h and defining it in arch code. In particular doing this

diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
index 37e9dce518aa..fc0788540d90 100644
--- a/include/linux/kexec.h
+++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
@@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ struct kexec_file_ops {
 #endif
 };
 
+extern const struct kexec_file_ops * const kexec_file_loaders[];
+
 /**
  * struct kexec_buf - parameters for finding a place for a buffer in memory
  * @image:	kexec image in which memory to search.
diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
index 17ba407d0e79..4e3d1e4bc7f6 100644
--- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
+++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
@@ -31,8 +31,6 @@
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include "kexec_internal.h"
 
-const __weak struct kexec_file_ops * const kexec_file_loaders[] = {NULL};
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
 static int kexec_calculate_store_digests(struct kimage *image);
 #else

A nice side effect of this solution is, that a developer who forgets to define
kexec_file_loaders gets a linker error. So he directly knows what's missing
instead of first having to find out where/why an error gets returned.

Otherwise the series is fine for me.

Thanks
Philipp

>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
>  static int kexec_calculate_store_digests(struct kimage *image);
>  #else
>  static int kexec_calculate_store_digests(struct kimage *image) { return 0; };
>  #endif
> 
> +int _kexec_kernel_image_probe(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
> +			     unsigned long buf_len)
> +{
> +	const struct kexec_file_ops * const *fops;
> +	int ret = -ENOEXEC;
> +
> +	for (fops = &kexec_file_loaders[0]; *fops && (*fops)->probe; ++fops) {
> +		ret = (*fops)->probe(buf, buf_len);
> +		if (!ret) {
> +			image->fops = *fops;
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  /* Architectures can provide this probe function */
>  int __weak arch_kexec_kernel_image_probe(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
>  					 unsigned long buf_len)
>  {
> -	return -ENOEXEC;
> +	return _kexec_kernel_image_probe(image, buf, buf_len);
> +}
> +
> +void *_kexec_kernel_image_load(struct kimage *image)
> +{
> +	if (!image->fops || !image->fops->load)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOEXEC);
> +
> +	return image->fops->load(image, image->kernel_buf,
> +				 image->kernel_buf_len, image->initrd_buf,
> +				 image->initrd_buf_len, image->cmdline_buf,
> +				 image->cmdline_buf_len);
>  }
> 
>  void * __weak arch_kexec_kernel_image_load(struct kimage *image)
>  {
> -	return ERR_PTR(-ENOEXEC);
> +	return _kexec_kernel_image_load(image);
> +}
> +
> +int _kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image)
> +{
> +	if (!image->fops || !image->fops->cleanup)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return image->fops->cleanup(image->image_loader_data);
>  }
> 
>  int __weak arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image)
>  {
> -	return -EINVAL;
> +	return _kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(image);
>  }
> 
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG
> +int _kexec_kernel_verify_sig(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
> +			    unsigned long buf_len)
> +{
> +	if (!image->fops || !image->fops->verify_sig) {
> +		pr_debug("kernel loader does not support signature verification.\n");
> +		return -EKEYREJECTED;
> +	}
> +
> +	return image->fops->verify_sig(buf, buf_len);
> +}
> +
>  int __weak arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
>  					unsigned long buf_len)
>  {
> -	return -EKEYREJECTED;
> +	return _kexec_kernel_verify_sig(image, buf, buf_len);
>  }
>  #endif
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-26 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-22 11:17 [PATCH v8 00/13] arm64: kexec: add kexec_file_load() support AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 01/13] resource: add walk_system_ram_res_rev() AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-23  8:36   ` Dave Young
2018-03-20  1:43     ` Baoquan He
2018-03-20  3:12       ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-03-20  3:48         ` Baoquan He
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 02/13] kexec_file: make an use of purgatory optional AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-23  8:49   ` Dave Young
2018-02-26 10:24     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-28 12:33       ` Dave Young
2018-03-01  2:59         ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 03/13] kexec_file, x86, powerpc: factor out kexec_file_ops functions AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-23  9:24   ` [PATCH v8 03/13] kexec_file,x86,powerpc: " Dave Young
2018-02-26 10:01     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-26 11:25       ` Philipp Rudo
2018-02-28 12:38       ` Dave Young
2018-03-01  3:18         ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-26 11:17   ` Philipp Rudo [this message]
2018-02-27  2:03     ` [PATCH v8 03/13] kexec_file, x86, powerpc: " AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-27  9:26       ` Philipp Rudo
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 04/13] x86: kexec_file: factor out elf core header related functions AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-24  3:15   ` Dave Young
2018-02-26  9:21     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 05/13] kexec_file, x86: move re-factored code to generic side AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 06/13] asm-generic: add kexec_file_load system call to unistd.h AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 07/13] arm64: kexec_file: invoke the kernel without purgatory AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 08/13] arm64: kexec_file: load initrd and device-tree AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 09/13] arm64: kexec_file: add crash dump support AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 10/13] arm64: kexec_file: add Image format support AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 11/13] arm64: kexec_file: enable KEXEC_FILE config AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 12/13] include: pe.h: remove message[] from mz header definition AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v8 13/13] arm64: kexec_file: enable KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG for Image AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-27  4:56 ` [PATCH v8 00/13] arm64: kexec: add kexec_file_load() support AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-28 12:25   ` Dave Young

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180226121718.3432bbd6@ThinkPad \
    --to=prudo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox