From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 08/12] arm64: cmpxchg: Include build_bug.h instead of bug.h for BUILD_BUG
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:33:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180227173322.GK29123@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180226154848.ejqxw5lkbiqqxlsf@salmiak>
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 03:48:49PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 03:04:56PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Having asm/cmpxchg.h pull in linux/bug.h is problematic because this
> > ends up pulling in the atomic bitops which themselves may be built on
> > top of atomic.h and cmpxchg.h.
> >
> > Instead, just include build_bug.h for the definition of BUILD_BUG.
>
> We also use VM_BUG_ON(), defined in <linux/mmdebug.h>, which includes
> <linux/bug.h>.
>
> ... so I think we still have some fragility here, albeit no worse than before.
>
> We also miss includes for:
>
> * <linux/percpu-defs.h> (raw_cpu_ptr)
> * <linux/preempt.h> (preempt_disable, preempt_enable)
Hmm, we can't include this one because it pulls in linux/bitops.h. I've
moved the percpu cmpxchg stuff into asm/percpu.h, but that too is missing
the linux/preempt.h #include, so I've added that as well.
Generally, I think if we want to clean up our #includes then that's better
done as a separate series rather than as a piecemeal effort, which will
likely fail to identify many of the underlying problems.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-27 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-26 15:04 [RFC PATCH v2 00/12] Rewrite asm-generic/bitops/{atomic, lock}.h and use on arm64 Will Deacon
2018-02-26 15:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/12] h8300: Don't include linux/kernel.h in asm/atomic.h Will Deacon
2018-02-26 15:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/12] m68k: Don't use asm-generic/bitops/lock.h Will Deacon
2018-02-26 15:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/12] asm-generic: Move some macros from linux/bitops.h to a new bits.h file Will Deacon
2018-02-26 15:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/12] openrisc: Don't pull in all of linux/bitops.h in asm/cmpxchg.h Will Deacon
2018-02-26 15:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/12] sh: Don't pull in all of linux/bitops.h in asm/cmpxchg-xchg.h Will Deacon
2018-02-26 15:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/12] arm64: fpsimd: include <linux/init.h> in fpsimd.h Will Deacon
2018-02-26 15:37 ` Mark Rutland
2018-02-26 15:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/12] arm64: lse: Include compiler_types.h and export.h for out-of-line LL/SC Will Deacon
2018-02-26 15:42 ` Mark Rutland
2018-02-26 15:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/12] arm64: cmpxchg: Include build_bug.h instead of bug.h for BUILD_BUG Will Deacon
2018-02-26 15:48 ` Mark Rutland
2018-02-27 17:33 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2018-02-27 17:34 ` Mark Rutland
2018-02-26 15:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/12] asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h: Rewrite using atomic_fetch_* Will Deacon
2018-02-26 15:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/12] asm-generic/bitops/lock.h: " Will Deacon
2018-02-26 15:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/12] arm64: Replace our atomic/lock bitop implementations with asm-generic Will Deacon
2018-02-26 15:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/12] arm64: bitops: Include <asm-generic/bitops/ext2-atomic-setbit.h> Will Deacon
2018-03-01 7:16 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/12] Rewrite asm-generic/bitops/{atomic,lock}.h and use on arm64 Masahiro Yamada
2018-03-12 3:56 ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-03-19 17:21 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180227173322.GK29123@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).