From: takahiro.akashi@linaro.org (AKASHI Takahiro)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] x86: kexec_file: remove X86_64 dependency from prepare_elf64_headers()
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2018 14:33:26 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180302053325.GO6019@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180302051956.GB2952@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
On Fri, Mar 02, 2018 at 01:19:56PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> On 02/27/18 at 01:48pm, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > The code guarded by CONFIG_X86_64 is necessary on some architectures
> > which have a dedicated kernel mapping outside of linear memory mapping.
> > (arm64 is among those.)
> >
> > In this patch, an additional argument, kernel_map, is added to enable/
> > disable the code removing #ifdef.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kernel/crash.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c b/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
> > index 2123fa0efc17..913fd8021f8a 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
> > @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static int prepare_elf64_ram_headers_callback(struct resource *res, void *arg)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int prepare_elf64_headers(struct crash_elf_data *ced,
> > +static int prepare_elf64_headers(struct crash_elf_data *ced, int kernel_map,
> > void **addr, unsigned long *sz)
> > {
> > Elf64_Ehdr *ehdr;
> > @@ -414,17 +414,17 @@ static int prepare_elf64_headers(struct crash_elf_data *ced,
> > phdr->p_filesz = phdr->p_memsz = VMCOREINFO_NOTE_SIZE;
> > (ehdr->e_phnum)++;
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > /* Prepare PT_LOAD type program header for kernel text region */
> > - phdr = (Elf64_Phdr *)bufp;
> > - bufp += sizeof(Elf64_Phdr);
> > - phdr->p_type = PT_LOAD;
> > - phdr->p_flags = PF_R|PF_W|PF_X;
> > - phdr->p_vaddr = (Elf64_Addr)_text;
> > - phdr->p_filesz = phdr->p_memsz = _end - _text;
> > - phdr->p_offset = phdr->p_paddr = __pa_symbol(_text);
> > - (ehdr->e_phnum)++;
> > -#endif
> > + if (kernel_map) {
> > + phdr = (Elf64_Phdr *)bufp;
> > + bufp += sizeof(Elf64_Phdr);
> > + phdr->p_type = PT_LOAD;
> > + phdr->p_flags = PF_R|PF_W|PF_X;
> > + phdr->p_vaddr = (Elf64_Addr)_text;
> > + phdr->p_filesz = phdr->p_memsz = _end - _text;
> > + phdr->p_offset = phdr->p_paddr = __pa_symbol(_text);
> > + (ehdr->e_phnum)++;
> > + }
> >
> > /* Go through all the ranges in cmem->ranges[] and prepare phdr */
> > for (i = 0; i < cmem->nr_ranges; i++) {
> > @@ -477,7 +477,8 @@ static int prepare_elf_headers(struct kimage *image, void **addr,
> > goto out;
> >
> > /* By default prepare 64bit headers */
> > - ret = prepare_elf64_headers(ced, addr, sz);
> > + ret = prepare_elf64_headers(ced,
> > + (int)IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64), addr, sz);
>
> A bool would be enough for kernel_map
Yeah, for now.
What I thought of is that we might want to extend its functionality
in the future as I did here for kernel_map without changing its interface.
But I'd defer to you.
-Takahiro AKASHI
> > if (ret)
> > goto out;
> >
>
> Thanks
> Dave
> > --
> > 2.16.2
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-02 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-27 4:48 [PATCH 0/7] kexec_file: refactoring for other architecutres AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-27 4:48 ` [PATCH 1/7] kexec_file: make an use of purgatory optional AKASHI Takahiro
2018-03-02 5:58 ` Dave Young
2018-03-02 6:11 ` Dave Young
2018-03-02 7:26 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-27 4:48 ` [PATCH 2/7] kexec_file, x86, powerpc: factor out kexec_file_ops functions AKASHI Takahiro
2018-03-02 5:04 ` [PATCH 2/7] kexec_file,x86,powerpc: " Dave Young
2018-03-02 5:24 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-03-02 5:53 ` Dave Young
2018-03-02 6:08 ` Dave Young
2018-03-02 7:16 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-03-02 7:56 ` Dave Young
2018-02-27 4:48 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86: kexec_file: purge system-ram walking from prepare_elf64_headers() AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-27 4:48 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86: kexec_file: remove X86_64 dependency " AKASHI Takahiro
2018-03-02 5:19 ` Dave Young
2018-03-02 5:33 ` AKASHI Takahiro [this message]
2018-02-27 4:48 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86: kexec_file: lift CRASH_MAX_RANGES limit on crash_mem buffer AKASHI Takahiro
2018-03-02 5:31 ` Dave Young
2018-03-02 5:36 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-02-27 4:48 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86: kexec_file: clean up prepare_elf64_headers() AKASHI Takahiro
2018-03-02 5:39 ` Dave Young
2018-03-02 5:58 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2018-03-02 6:04 ` Dave Young
2018-02-27 4:48 ` [PATCH 7/7] kexec_file, x86: move re-factored code to generic side AKASHI Takahiro
2018-03-02 5:56 ` [PATCH 0/7] kexec_file: refactoring for other architecutres Dave Young
2018-03-05 2:36 ` Dave Young
2018-03-06 10:28 ` AKASHI Takahiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180302053325.GO6019@linaro.org \
--to=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).