From: alex.shi@linaro.org (Alex Shi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/39] arm64: Use pointer masking to limit uaccess speculation
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 17:06:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180309090722.26279-8-alex.shi@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180309090722.26279-1-alex.shi@linaro.org>
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
commit 4d8efc2d5ee4 upstream.
Similarly to x86, mitigate speculation past an access_ok() check by
masking the pointer against the address limit before use.
Even if we don't expect speculative writes per se, it is plausible that
a CPU may still speculate at least as far as fetching a cache line for
writing, hence we also harden put_user() and clear_user() for peace of
mind.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
index c625cc5531fc..75363d723262 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -121,6 +121,26 @@ static inline unsigned long __range_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
#define access_ok(type, addr, size) __range_ok((unsigned long)(addr), size)
#define user_addr_max get_fs
+/*
+ * Sanitise a uaccess pointer such that it becomes NULL if above the
+ * current addr_limit.
+ */
+#define uaccess_mask_ptr(ptr) (__typeof__(ptr))__uaccess_mask_ptr(ptr)
+static inline void __user *__uaccess_mask_ptr(const void __user *ptr)
+{
+ void __user *safe_ptr;
+
+ asm volatile(
+ " bics xzr, %1, %2\n"
+ " csel %0, %1, xzr, eq\n"
+ : "=&r" (safe_ptr)
+ : "r" (ptr), "r" (current_thread_info()->addr_limit)
+ : "cc");
+
+ csdb();
+ return safe_ptr;
+}
+
/*
* The "__xxx" versions of the user access functions do not verify the address
* space - it must have been done previously with a separate "access_ok()"
@@ -193,7 +213,7 @@ do { \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__p = (ptr); \
might_fault(); \
access_ok(VERIFY_READ, __p, sizeof(*__p)) ? \
- __get_user((x), __p) : \
+ __p = uaccess_mask_ptr(__p), __get_user((x), __p) : \
((x) = 0, -EFAULT); \
})
@@ -259,7 +279,7 @@ do { \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__p = (ptr); \
might_fault(); \
access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, __p, sizeof(*__p)) ? \
- __put_user((x), __p) : \
+ __p = uaccess_mask_ptr(__p), __put_user((x), __p) : \
-EFAULT; \
})
@@ -297,7 +317,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __must_check copy_in_user(void __user *to, const voi
static inline unsigned long __must_check clear_user(void __user *to, unsigned long n)
{
if (access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, to, n))
- n = __clear_user(to, n);
+ n = __clear_user(__uaccess_mask_ptr(to), n);
return n;
}
--
2.16.2.440.gc6284da
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-09 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-09 9:06 spectre backport for LTS 4.4 review Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:06 ` [PATCH 01/39] mm: Introduce lm_alias Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:06 ` [PATCH 02/39] arm64: barrier: Add CSDB macros to control data-value prediction Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:06 ` [PATCH 03/39] arm64: Implement array_index_mask_nospec() Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:06 ` [PATCH 04/39] arm64: move TASK_* definitions to <asm/processor.h> Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:06 ` [PATCH 05/39] arm64: Make USER_DS an inclusive limit Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:06 ` [PATCH 06/39] arm64: entry: Ensure branch through syscall table is bounded under speculation Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:06 ` Alex Shi [this message]
2018-03-09 9:06 ` [PATCH 08/39] arm64: uaccess: Prevent speculative use of the current addr_limit Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:06 ` [PATCH 09/39] arm64: uaccess: Don't bother eliding access_ok checks in __{get, put}_user Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:06 ` [PATCH 10/39] arm64: futex: Mask __user pointers prior to dereference Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:06 ` [PATCH 11/39] drivers/firmware: Expose psci_get_version through psci_ops structure Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:06 ` [PATCH 12/39] arm64: Move post_ttbr_update_workaround to C code Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:06 ` [PATCH 13/39] arm64: Add skeleton to harden the branch predictor against aliasing attacks Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:06 ` [PATCH 14/39] arm64: Move BP hardening to check_and_switch_context Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:06 ` [PATCH 15/39] arm64: KVM: Use per-CPU vector when BP hardening is enabled Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:06 ` [PATCH 16/39] arm64: entry: Apply BP hardening for high-priority synchronous exceptions Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 17/39] arm64: entry: Apply BP hardening for suspicious interrupts from EL0 Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 18/39] arm64: cpu_errata: Allow an erratum to be match for all revisions of a core Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 19/39] arm64: prefetch: add alternative pattern for CPUs without a prefetcher Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 20/39] arm64: cputype: Add missing MIDR values for Cortex-A72 and Cortex-A75 Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 21/39] arm64: Implement branch predictor hardening for affected Cortex-A CPUs Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 22/39] arm64: KVM: Increment PC after handling an SMC trap Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 23/39] arm/arm64: KVM: Consolidate the PSCI include files Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 24/39] arm/arm64: KVM: Add PSCI_VERSION helper Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 25/39] arm/arm64: KVM: Add smccc accessors to PSCI code Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 26/39] arm/arm64: KVM: Implement PSCI 1.0 support Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 27/39] ARM: 8478/2: arm/arm64: add arm-smccc Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 28/39] ARM: 8479/2: add implementation for arm-smccc Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 29/39] ARM: 8480/2: arm64: " Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 30/39] ARM: 8481/2: drivers: psci: replace psci firmware calls Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 31/39] arm/arm64: KVM: Advertise SMCCC v1.1 Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 32/39] arm/arm64: KVM: Turn kvm_psci_version into a static inline Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 33/39] arm64: KVM: Report SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 BP hardening support Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 34/39] arm64: KVM: Add SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 fast handling Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 35/39] firmware/psci: Expose PSCI conduit Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 36/39] firmware/psci: Expose SMCCC version through psci_ops Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 37/39] arm/arm64: smccc: Make function identifiers an unsigned quantity Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 38/39] arm/arm64: smccc: Implement SMCCC v1.1 inline primitive Alex Shi
2018-03-09 9:07 ` [PATCH 39/39] arm64: Add ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 BP hardening support Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180309090722.26279-8-alex.shi@linaro.org \
--to=alex.shi@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).