From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: boris.brezillon@bootlin.com (Boris Brezillon) Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 16:24:25 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 01/52] mtd: rawnand: add hooks that may be called during nand_scan() In-Reply-To: <20180302170400.6712-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> References: <20180302170400.6712-1-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> <20180302170400.6712-2-miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> Message-ID: <20180315162425.04b98745@bbrezillon> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 2 Mar 2018 18:03:09 +0100 Miquel Raynal wrote: > In order to remove the limitation that forbids dynamic allocation in > nand_scan_ident(), we must create a path that will be the same for all > controller drivers. The idea is to use nand_scan() instead of the widely > implemented nand_scan_ident()/nand_scan_tail() couple. In order to > achieve this, controller drivers will need to adjust some parameters > between these two functions depending on the NAND chip wired on them. > > For that, a hook called ->attach_chip() is created in the > nand_hw_control structure (called *controller in struct nand_chip) of > the NAND chip structure. > > Another hook, ->detach_chip() is also introduced in order to clean the > controller driver's potential allocations in case of failure of > nand_scan_tail(). There is no need for the controller driver to call the > ->detach_chip() hook directly upon error after a successful nand_scan(). > In this situation, calling nand_release() as before is enough. > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- > include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h | 6 ++++++ > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > index ef0a44a8c3d5..182904b2fc07 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c > @@ -6647,11 +6647,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_scan_tail); > */ > int nand_scan(struct mtd_info *mtd, int maxchips) > { > + struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd); > int ret; > > ret = nand_scan_ident(mtd, maxchips, NULL); > - if (!ret) > - ret = nand_scan_tail(mtd); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + if (chip->ecc.attach_chip) { > + ret = chip->ecc.attach_chip(chip); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > + > + ret = nand_scan_tail(mtd); > + if (ret && chip->ecc.detach_chip) > + chip->ecc.detach_chip(chip); > + > return ret; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(nand_scan); > @@ -6679,7 +6691,12 @@ void nand_cleanup(struct nand_chip *chip) > > /* Free manufacturer priv data. */ > nand_manufacturer_cleanup(chip); > + > + /* Free controller specific allocations after chip identification */ > + if (chip->ecc.detach_chip) > + chip->ecc.detach_chip(chip); > } > + > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nand_cleanup); > > /** > diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h > index 348f2aba0b9e..53bb6ef1a7c2 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h > +++ b/include/linux/mtd/rawnand.h > @@ -576,6 +576,10 @@ static const struct nand_ecc_caps __name = { \ > * @read_oob_raw: function to read chip OOB data without ECC > * @read_oob: function to read chip OOB data > * @write_oob: function to write chip OOB data > + * @attach_chip: Callback that may be called between nand_detec() and > + * nand_scan_tail() during nand_scan() (optional). > + * @detach_chip: Callback that may be called if nand_scan_tail() fails > + * (optional). > */ > struct nand_ecc_ctrl { > nand_ecc_modes_t mode; > @@ -616,6 +620,8 @@ struct nand_ecc_ctrl { > int (*read_oob)(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip, int page); > int (*write_oob)(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip, > int page); > + int (*attach_chip)(struct nand_chip *chip); > + void (*detach_chip)(struct nand_chip *chip); As said in my reply to the cover letter, I'd prefer to have these hooks in nand_hw_ctrl. > }; > > /** -- Boris Brezillon, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com