From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com (Thomas Petazzoni)
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 16:04:25 +0200
Subject: Extending the Marvell ICU support
Message-ID: <20180404160425.49fc620d@windsurf>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hello Marc,

Back in June 2017, you helped me designing the ICU irqchip driver (in
drivers/irqchip/irq-mvebu-icu.c), and we now need to extend it to
support new functionality, and it would be useful to have your insight
on how to implement this new functionality.

Recap of what we have today
===========================

Marvell Armada 7K/8K are split in two parts: the AP side (with the CPU
core, GIC, and a few peripherals) and the CP side (with most
high-performance I/Os).

The GIC on the AP side has 2 ranges of 64 SPIs that are reserved from
interrupts coming from devices in the CP. The AP has a piece of
hardware that Marvell calls the GICP, which provides two registers to
set/clear an interrupt within those two ranges of 64 SPIs.

Each CP has an ICU unit, which turns the wired interrupts coming from
the devices inside the CP into message interrupts, that are signaled to
the AP by writing to the GICP registers, in the end triggering a SPI at
the GIC level.

In Linux, we have modeled the gicp as an MSI provider, and the ICU as a
MSI consumer.

Thanks to this, we handle all the NSR (Non Secured) interrupts from
devices in the CP.

What we need now
================

In addition to handling NSRs, the ICU also handles SEIs, which stands
for System Error Interrupt. Some devices in the CP raise SEIs instead
of NSRs.

On the AP side, 64 SEIs can be handled. Whenever one SEI is pending,
there is a single GIC interrupt that gets raised. Then 2 32-bit
registers called GICP_SECR0 and GICP_SECR1 can be used to find out
which SEI interrupt was raised.

Among those 64 SEIs, the first 21 are reserved for interrupts coming
from the AP, while the remaining ones are available for SEI interrupts
coming from the CPs. The ICU can be configured to write to a register
called GICP_SET_SEI register to raise a SEI.

Contrary to the NSR interrupts where there is a 1:1 mapping between one
ICU interrupt and one SPI interrupt in the GIC, for the SEI interrupts
there is a single GIC interrupt, and a de-multiplexing to find out
which specific SEI was raised.

The diagram at https://bootlin.com/~thomas/icu.pdf should hopefully
help understand a bit the situation. I hope you'll enjoy my drawing
skills :-)

Our question is how to model this in the irqchip/irqdomain world.

We were thinking of creating a gicp-sei Device Tree node, and a
corresponding irqchip driver. This irqchip would provide 21 wired
interrupts for the devices in the AP, and a MSI domain of 64-21
interrupts available for the CP.

Then, the ICU would have two msi-parents: the gicp used for NSR
interrupts, and the gicp-sei for the SEI interrupts. However, having
multiple MSI parents is currently not supported, and this is probably a
hint that we're going in the wrong direction.

Here is what the DT representation could look like:

ap {
	interrupt-parent = <&gic>;

	gic: interrupt-controller at ... { ... };

	gicp: interrupt-controller at ... {
		compatible = "marvell,ap806-gicp";
		reg = <0x3f0040 0x10>;
		marvell,spi-ranges = <64 64>, <288 64>;
		msi-controller;
	};

	gicp_sei: interrupt-controller at ... {
		compatible = "marvell,ap806-gicp-sei";
		reg = <...>;
		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
		interrupt-controller;
		msi-controller;
	};

	device {
		... some random device in the AP that uses a SEI ...
		interrupt-extended = <&gicp_sei 12>;
	};
};

cp {
	interrupt-parent = <&icu>;

	icu: interrupt-controller at ... {
		compatible = "marvell,cp110-icu";
		reg = <...>;
		#interrupt-cells = <3>;
		interrupt-controller;
		msi-parent = <&gicp>, <&gicp_sei>;
	};

	/* This device uses a NSR */
	rtc {
		reg = <...>;
		interrupts = <ICU_GRP_NSR 77 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
	};

	some-other-device {
		reg = <...>;
		interrupts = <ICU_GRP_SEI 12 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
	};
};

However, as explained above, having multiple msi-parents is currently
not supported. Should we add support for that ? Do you see a
different/better way of supporting our use case ?

It is worth mentioning that the ICU also support REIs, which work like
the SEIs: there is a single GIC interrupt (n?33), one register to raise
a REI (GICP_SET_REI) and two 32-bits registers (GICP_RECR0/GICP_RECR1)
to find which REI was raised. So we might have to support this in the
future as well. REI stands for RAM Error Interrupt.

As usual, I'm available on IRC to discuss this live. I'm sure there are
some bits of information that I forgot, and that will be needed to
fully understand what our situation is.

Thanks a lot in advance for your help!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com