From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jglisse@redhat.com (Jerome Glisse)
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 10:53:56 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] move __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL in Kconfig
In-Reply-To: <20180409140721.GI21835@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <1523282229-20731-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20180409140721.GI21835@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Message-ID: <20180409145344.GA3285@redhat.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 04:07:21PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 09-04-18 15:57:06, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> > The per architecture __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL is defined statically in the
> > per architecture header files. This doesn't allow to make other
> > configuration dependent on it.
> > 
> > This series is moving the __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SPECIAL into the Kconfig files,
> > setting it automatically when architectures was already setting it in
> > header file.
> > 
> > There is no functional change introduced by this series.
> 
> I would just fold all three patches into a single one. It is much easier
> to review that those selects are done properly when you can see that the
> define is set for the same architecture.
> 
> In general, I like the patch. It is always quite painful to track per
> arch defines.

You can also add Reviewed-by: J?r?me Glisse <jglisse@redhat> my grep fu
showed no place that was forgotten.

Cheers,
J?r?me