linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/13] locking/qspinlock: Remove unbounded cmpxchg loop from locking slowpath
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 15:06:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180412140605.GB21296@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e6989d0-a6b1-e6fb-4f70-ab6849b715da@redhat.com>

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 03:53:16PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> > index 396701e8c62d..a8fc402b3f3a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> > +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
> > @@ -162,6 +162,17 @@ struct __qspinlock {
> >  
> >  #if _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8
> >  /**
> > + * clear_pending - clear the pending bit.
> > + * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
> > + *
> > + * *,1,* -> *,0,*
> > + */
> > +static __always_inline void clear_pending(struct qspinlock *lock)
> > +{
> > +	WRITE_ONCE(lock->pending, 0);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> >   * clear_pending_set_locked - take ownership and clear the pending bit.
> >   * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
> >   *
> > @@ -201,6 +212,17 @@ static __always_inline u32 xchg_tail(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 tail)
> >  #else /* _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8 */
> >  
> >  /**
> > + * clear_pending - clear the pending bit.
> > + * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
> > + *
> > + * *,1,* -> *,0,*
> > + */
> > +static __always_inline void clear_pending(struct qspinlock *lock)
> > +{
> > +	atomic_andnot(_Q_PENDING_VAL, &lock->val);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> >   * clear_pending_set_locked - take ownership and clear the pending bit.
> >   * @lock: Pointer to queued spinlock structure
> >   *
> 
> BTW, there is a similar clear_pending() function in
> qspinlock_paravirt.c. I think you need to remove that with this patch.

Thanks, I'll do that. I did build and bisect this series... for arm64, which
is completely useless as it doesn't get compiled until the final patch which
I haven't posted here.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-12 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-11 18:01 [PATCH v2 00/13] kernel/locking: qspinlock improvements Will Deacon
2018-04-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] barriers: Introduce smp_cond_load_relaxed and atomic_cond_read_relaxed Will Deacon
2018-04-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] locking/qspinlock: Bound spinning on pending->locked transition in slowpath Will Deacon
2018-04-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] locking/qspinlock/x86: Increase _Q_PENDING_LOOPS upper bound Will Deacon
2018-04-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] locking/qspinlock: Remove unbounded cmpxchg loop from locking slowpath Will Deacon
2018-04-11 19:34   ` Waiman Long
2018-04-11 20:35     ` Waiman Long
2018-04-11 19:53   ` Waiman Long
2018-04-12 14:06     ` Will Deacon [this message]
2018-04-12 14:16       ` Waiman Long
2018-04-12 14:18         ` Will Deacon
2018-04-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] locking/qspinlock: Kill cmpxchg loop when claiming lock from head of queue Will Deacon
2018-04-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] locking/qspinlock: Use atomic_cond_read_acquire Will Deacon
2018-04-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] locking/mcs: Use smp_cond_load_acquire() in mcs spin loop Will Deacon
2018-04-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] locking/qspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_relaxed to wait for next node Will Deacon
2018-04-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] locking/qspinlock: Merge struct __qspinlock into struct qspinlock Will Deacon
2018-04-11 19:13   ` Waiman Long
2018-04-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] locking/qspinlock: Make queued_spin_unlock use smp_store_release Will Deacon
2018-04-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] locking/qspinlock: Elide back-to-back RELEASE operations with smp_wmb() Will Deacon
2018-04-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] locking/qspinlock: Use try_cmpxchg instead of cmpxchg when locking Will Deacon
2018-04-11 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] locking/qspinlock: Add stat tracking for pending vs slowpath Will Deacon
2018-04-13  9:24 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] kernel/locking: qspinlock improvements Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180412140605.GB21296@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).