From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@bootlin.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 13:17:37 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v6 01/11] ARM: sunxi: smp: Move assembly code into a file In-Reply-To: References: <20180416215032.5023-1-mylene.josserand@bootlin.com> <20180416215032.5023-2-mylene.josserand@bootlin.com> Message-ID: <20180417111737.6dous6eiuvjn33jf@flea> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:12:41AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 5:50 AM, Myl?ne Josserand > wrote: > > Move the assembly code for cluster cache enabling and resuming > > into an assembly file instead of having it directly in C code. > > > > Remove the CFLAGS because we are using the ARM directive "arch" > > instead. > > > > Signed-off-by: Myl?ne Josserand > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Makefile | 4 +-- > > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c | 82 +++---------------------------------------- > > 3 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S > > I'm still not convinced about this whole "move ASM to separate > file" thing, especially now that you aren't actually adding any > sunxi-specific ASM code beyond a simple function call. > > Could you drop this for now? I'd really like to have this merged actually. There's a significant readibility improvement, so even if there's no particular functional improvement, I'd still call it a win. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: