From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@bootlin.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:16:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v7 06/11] ARM: sunxi: Add initialization of CNTVOFF In-Reply-To: <20180420211022.11759-7-mylene.josserand@bootlin.com> References: <20180420211022.11759-1-mylene.josserand@bootlin.com> <20180420211022.11759-7-mylene.josserand@bootlin.com> Message-ID: <20180423081609.dirsitco3aeaqztx@flea> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 11:10:17PM +0200, Myl?ne Josserand wrote: > Add the initialization of CNTVOFF for sun8i-a83t. > > For boot CPU, create a new machine that handles this > function's call in an "init_early" callback. We need to initialize > CNTVOFF before the arch timer's initialization otherwise, it will > not be taken into account and fails to boot correctly. > Because of that, this function can't be called in SMP's early_initcall > function which is called after timer's init. > > For secondary CPUs, add this function into secondary_startup > assembly entry. > > Signed-off-by: Myl?ne Josserand > --- > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S | 1 + > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S > index 37dc772701f3..32d76be98541 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/headsmp.S > @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ ENDPROC(sunxi_mc_smp_cluster_cache_enable) > > ENTRY(sunxi_mc_smp_secondary_startup) > bl sunxi_mc_smp_cluster_cache_enable > + bl secure_cntvoff_init > b secondary_startup > ENDPROC(sunxi_mc_smp_secondary_startup) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c > index 5e9602ce1573..ddc439f6269b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ > #include > > #include > +#include > > static const char * const sunxi_board_dt_compat[] = { > "allwinner,sun4i-a10", > @@ -62,7 +63,6 @@ MACHINE_END > static const char * const sun8i_board_dt_compat[] = { > "allwinner,sun8i-a23", > "allwinner,sun8i-a33", > - "allwinner,sun8i-a83t", > "allwinner,sun8i-h2-plus", > "allwinner,sun8i-h3", > "allwinner,sun8i-r40", > @@ -75,6 +75,24 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(SUN8I_DT, "Allwinner sun8i Family") > .dt_compat = sun8i_board_dt_compat, > MACHINE_END > > +void __init sun8i_cntvoff_init(void) > +{ > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > + secure_cntvoff_init(); > +#endif > +} > + > +static const char * const sun8i_cntvoff_board_dt_compat[] = { > + "allwinner,sun8i-a83t", > + NULL, > +}; > + > +DT_MACHINE_START(SUN8I_CNTVOFF_DT, "Allwinner sun8i-a83t board") This name still doesn't really make much sense. It's an A83t, that's it. Apart from the other minor comment I had, and once that name has been fixed: Acked-by: Maxime Ripard Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: