From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@bootlin.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:39:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/7] ARM: dts: sun8i: h3: Split out common board design for ALL-H3-CC In-Reply-To: References: <20180424113424.13196-1-wens@csie.org> <20180424113424.13196-3-wens@csie.org> <20180424121353.zxujyehsw3er2xq6@flea> <20180424193754.jsuucbq57onhxhqe@flea> Message-ID: <20180425123915.twp3m73o5xap3m6j@flea> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:19:20AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 3:37 AM, Maxime Ripard > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:17:11PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Maxime Ripard > >> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 07:34:19PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> >> The Libre Computer Project ALL-H3-CC has three models, all using the > >> >> same board design, but with different pin compatible SoCs and amount of > >> >> DRAM. > >> >> > >> >> Currently only the H3 1GB DRAM variant is supported. To support the two > >> >> other variants, first split the original device tree into a common board > >> >> design part and an SoC specific part. > >> >> > >> >> The SoC part only defines which SoC is used and model name, and includes > >> >> the SoC specific dtsi file and the common design dtsi file. > >> >> > >> >> Also fix up the SPDX identifier line to use the correct comment style, > >> >> and place it on the first line. > >> >> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > >> >> --- > >> >> .../boot/dts/sun8i-h3-libretech-all-h3-cc.dts | 213 +----------------- > >> >> ....dts => sunxi-hx-libretech-all-h3-cc.dtsi} | 11 +- > >> > > >> > I think I prefer the name of Neil's DTSI better, and since pretty much > >> > the same patches (a couple of hours) before, we'll merge them (while > >> > merging the rest of your patches, obviously). > >> > > >> > Does that work for you? > >> > >> I would like for the regulator voltage fix to be merged before the split. > >> This will make it trivial to back port, instead of having to reverse the > >> split, and maybe failing. > > > > Yes, I was just talking about replacing your two redundant patches, > > but keeping the order you have. > > That works for me. Might require a little fixing up. > Let me know if you need help with that. I did. You can double check if you want :) maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: