linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jan.glauber@caviumnetworks.com (Jan Glauber)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: arm64: W+X mapping check failures
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 15:37:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180425133704.GA6474@hc> (raw)

Hi all,

enabling CONFIG_DEBUG_WX we see insecure mappings reported across various kernel
versions and machines. I've not yet seen this with upstream but that doesn't
mean much as the issue is a race and I cannot trigger it reliably.

The reported W+X mappings are gone after the boot is finished. The addresses
all belong to .init.* sections of the first loaded kernel modules.

Example log (I changed the warnings as I found the backtrace quite useless):

[   39.157884] Freeing unused kernel memory: 5248K
[   39.167997] note_prot_wx: Found insecure W+X mapping at start: ffff000000ab9000  addr: ffff000000abd000  pages: 4
[   39.178246] note_prot_wx: Found insecure W+X mapping at start: ffff000000ac3000  addr: ffff000000ac5000  pages: 2
[   39.188495] note_prot_wx: Found insecure W+X mapping at start: ffff000000acd000  addr: ffff000000ad0000  pages: 3
[   39.198745] note_prot_wx: Found insecure W+X mapping at start: ffff000000af9000  addr: ffff000000afc000  pages: 3
[   39.212981] Checked W+X mappings: FAILED, 12 W+X pages found, 0 non-UXN pages found

I think this is a race between module loading and the ptdump_check_wx().
The RCU'd do_free_init() can be delayed _after_ ptdump_check_wx() for a coming module.

I tried using stop_machine() around the memory check similar to arm but that does not
solve the race. It is not a critical issue as the .init sections are freed afterwards
anyway but still the warning is a bit misleading.

Any thoughts?

--Jan

             reply	other threads:[~2018-04-25 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-25 13:37 Jan Glauber [this message]
2018-04-25 13:55 ` arm64: W+X mapping check failures Jeffrey Hugo
2018-04-25 14:50   ` Jan Glauber
2018-04-25 15:18     ` Jeffrey Hugo
2018-04-25 13:57 ` Mark Rutland
2018-04-25 14:47   ` Jan Glauber
2018-04-26 11:00     ` James Morse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180425133704.GA6474@hc \
    --to=jan.glauber@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).