[dragonboard] [PATCH 1/1] dts: qcom: db820c: Add gpio-line-names property

[manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org (Manivannan Sadhasivam)]

Hi Linus,

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 03:23:57PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam
> <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:48:59AM +0300, Todor Tomov wrote:
> 
> >> > + * When the 96Board naming of a line and the schematic name of
> >> > + * the same line are in conflict, the 96Board specification
> >> > + * takes precedence, which means that the external UART on the
> >> > + * LSEC is named UART0 while the schematic and SoC names this
> >> > + * UART3. This is only for the informational lines i.e. "[FOO]",
> >>
> >> It seems to me that this can lead to some confusion for cases when
> >> some schematic names have 96board names and others don't. (An
> >> example below.) However I don't really see any better way to do
> >> it. I'm wondering whether adding the schematic name in
> >> the comment (for gpios which are named with 96board names)
> >> can help a little. What do you think? Or any other idea?
> >>
> >
> > Specifying the schematic names in comments is a good idea!
> >
> > Linus: Do you have any suggestion here?
> 
> Go for this.
> 

Thanks!

> Generally ask the question: what does the user need?
> 
> In this case, especially userspace libraries like mriaa (right name?)

MRAA :)

> should be able to work out-of-the-box without knowing what
> board it is but know it has a 96board connector.
>

I have sent out v2, incorporating the review comments from Todor.
Can you please review it?

Thanks,
Mani

> Yours,
> Linus Walleij