From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 10:12:29 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] locking/atomic, asm-generic: instrument ordering
 variants
In-Reply-To: <20180504182422.GT12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20180504173937.25300-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
 <20180504173937.25300-2-mark.rutland@arm.com>
 <20180504180105.GS12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20180504180909.dnhfflibjwywnm4l@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
 <20180504182422.GT12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Message-ID: <20180505091229.smbvp7vlgpyld7dn@salmiak>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 08:24:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 07:09:09PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 08:01:05PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 06:39:32PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> 
> > > >  include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h | 1195 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > >  1 file changed, 1008 insertions(+), 187 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > Is there really no way to either generate or further macro compress this?
> > 
> > I can definitely macro compress this somewhat, but the bulk of the
> > repetition will be the ifdeffery, which can't be macro'd away IIUC.
> 
> Right, much like what we already have in linux/atomic.h I suspect,
> having to duplicating that isn't brilliant either.
> 
> > Generating this with a script is possible -- do we do anything like that
> > elsewhere?
> 
> There's include/generated/ in your build directory. But nothing on this
> scale I think.

Sure. I'm not familiar with how we generate those, so I'll go digging through
the build infrastructure.

Thanks,
Mark.