From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@bootlin.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 12:20:33 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v3 02/14] drivers: soc: sunxi: Add dedicated compatibles for the A13, A20 and A33 In-Reply-To: References: <20180507124500.20434-1-paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com> <20180507124500.20434-3-paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com> Message-ID: <20180511102033.i6jtzljbvkg47wz3@flea> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 10:05:33PM -0700, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 5:44 AM, Paul Kocialkowski > wrote: > > This introduces platform-specific compatibles for the A13, A20 and A33 > > SRAM driver. No particular adaptation for these platforms is required at > > this point, although this might become the case in the future. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski > > --- > > drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c b/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c > > index 74cb81f37bd6..43ebc3bd33f2 100644 > > --- a/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c > > +++ b/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c > > @@ -315,6 +315,9 @@ static int sunxi_sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > > > static const struct of_device_id sunxi_sram_dt_match[] = { > > { .compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-sram-controller" }, > > + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a13-sram-controller" }, > > + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-sram-controller" }, > > + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a33-sram-controller" }, > > We should probably name these "system-controller". Maxime? This would make sense yes, but we don't really need to add the A20 one to the driver, it's exactly the same than the A10. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: