From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: vkoul@kernel.org (Vinod)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 10:51:07 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: check if the runtime pm enabled
In-Reply-To: <20180514161852.9620-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
References: <20180514161852.9620-1-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20180517052107.GT13271@vkoul-mobl>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 14-05-18, 17:18, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> Disabling pm runtime at probe is not sufficient to get BAM working
> on remotely controller instances. pm_runtime_get_sync() would return
> -EACCES in such cases.
> So check if runtime pm is enabled before returning error from bam functions.
> 
> Fixes: 5b4a68952a89 ("dmaengine: qcom: bam_dma: disable runtime pm on remote controlled")
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
> index d29275b97e84..5f4babebc508 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/bam_dma.c
> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static void bam_free_chan(struct dma_chan *chan)
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(bdev->dev);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> +	if (pm_runtime_enabled(bdev->dev) && ret < 0)

would it make sense to first check enabled and do _get_sync() 

        if (pm_runtime_enabled()) {
                ret = pm_runtime_get_sync() {
                ...
                }
        }

thus making clear in code that we do calls only when it is enabled. Also you can
add a local macro for this code and use that rather than copy pasting :)

-- 
~Vinod