From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: shawnguo@kernel.org (Shawn Guo)
Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 14:26:33 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] soc: imx: gpcv2: Do not pass static memory as
 platform data
In-Reply-To: <CAHQ1cqGCG0rwPcpoY+bnjcyupg18x1TvULJzvAjRxSkL6z1U_Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20180410183210.28052-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>
 <CAHQ1cqGCG0rwPcpoY+bnjcyupg18x1TvULJzvAjRxSkL6z1U_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20180520062631.GS26863@dragon>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 03:35:55PM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Andrey Smirnov
> <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Platform device core assumes the ownership of dev.platform_data as
> > well as that it is dynamically allocated and it will try to kfree it
> > as a part of platform_device_release(). Change the code to use
> > platform_device_add_data() n instead of a pointer to a static memory
> > to avoid causing a BUG() when calling platform_device_put().
> >
> > The problem can be reproduced by artificially enabling the error path
> > of platform_device_add() call (around line 357).
> >
> > Note that this change also allows us to constify imx7_pgc_domains,
> > since we no longer need to be able to modify it.
> >
> 
> Shawn,
> 
> What's the status of these two patches? Do I need to change anything
> or are they good to go?

The patches were queued on imx/drivers branch for a while.  I forgot to
let you know.  Sorry.

Shawn