Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: robh@kernel.org (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 12/13] ARM: dts: ti: add dra71-evm FIT description file
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 15:01:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180522200100.GA23937@rob-hp-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43ff3894-a287-1558-687c-40f50712735c@ti.com>

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 09:57:54AM +0300, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 17/04/18 17:49, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> [180417 09:36]:
> > > In typical setup, you can boot a large number of different configs via:
> > > 
> > > bootm 0x82000000#dra71-evm#nand#lcd-auo-g101evn01.0
> > > 
> > > ... assuming the configs were named like that, and assuming they would be
> > > compatible with each other. The am57xx-evm example provided is better, as
> > > you can chain the different cameras to the available evm configs.
> > 
> > Why not just do it in the bootloader to put together the dtb?
> > 
> > Then for external devices, you could just pass info on the
> > kernel cmdline with lcd=foo camera=bar if they cannot be
> > detected over I2C.
> 
> (Added Linux ARM list to CC, this was not part of the original delivery.)
> 
> Ok trying to resurrect this thread a bit. Is there any kind of consensus how
> things like this should be handled? Should we add the DT overlay files to
> kernel tree or not?

IMO, yes.

> Should we add any kind of build infra to kernel tree, and at what level
> would this be? Just DT overlay file building support, and drop the FIT build
> support as was proposed in this RFC series or...?

I think I mentioned this already, but I expect that this is going to 
cause a number of conversions of dtsi + dtsi -> dtb into base dts and 
overlay(s) dts files. In doing so, we still need to be able to build the 
original, full dtb.

> U-boot can obviously parse the base DTB + overlay DTB:s into a single DTB,
> but this is somewhat clumsy approach and is relatively error prone to get it
> right.

Why? How is the kernel better?

> Building the FIT image post kernel build would also be possible, but who
> would be doing this, is there any need to get this done in generic manner or
> shall we just add SoC vendor specific tools for this?

I'll tell you up front, I'm not a fan of FIT image (nor uImage, 
Android boot image, $bootloader image). If you want a collection of 
files and some configuration data, use a filesystem and a text file.

Rob

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-22 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1523956215-28154-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com>
     [not found] ` <1523956215-28154-13-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com>
     [not found]   ` <20180417092924.GB20335@flint.armlinux.org.uk>
     [not found]     ` <ad5ef67d-d566-0034-a7cd-09a549cbd6d7@ti.com>
     [not found]       ` <20180417144913.GD5669@atomide.com>
2018-05-21  6:57         ` [RFC 12/13] ARM: dts: ti: add dra71-evm FIT description file Tero Kristo
2018-05-22 20:01           ` Rob Herring [this message]
2018-05-23  5:55             ` Tero Kristo
2018-05-23 14:13               ` Rob Herring
2018-05-23 18:37               ` Tony Lindgren
2018-05-29 17:05             ` Frank Rowand
2018-05-29 17:33               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-05-29 22:45                 ` Frank Rowand
2018-05-29 22:51                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180522200100.GA23937@rob-hp-laptop \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox