From: linux@armlinux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM; fix cpu_v7_bugs_init reference
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 11:25:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180529102502.GH17671@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180529102301.1145470-1-arnd@arndb.de>
Please revalidate against the latest patches, this area has changed.
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:22:06PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The cpu_v7_bugs_init() function is referenced by the ARMv7 processor
> implementation, but is defined conditionally, leading to a link error when
> CONFIG_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR is disabled:
>
> arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.o:(.init.data+0xc): undefined reference to `cpu_v7_bugs_init'
> arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.o:(.init.data+0x74): undefined reference to `cpu_v7_bugs_init'
> arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.o: In function `cpu_v7_ca8_ibe':
> proc-v7-bugs.c:(.text+0x14): undefined reference to `cpu_v7_bugs_init'
> arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.o: In function `cpu_v7_ca15_ibe':
> proc-v7-bugs.c:(.text+0x30): undefined reference to `cpu_v7_bugs_init'
>
> There is a '.weak' directive for this symbol, which was apparently
> intended to avoid the problem, but the file is lacking an actual global
> definition for the function, so it has no effect.
>
> This adds an empty function definition for it, which can now get used
> as the fallback.
>
> Fixes: 8d9267cedb9e ("ARM: spectre-v2: harden user aborts in kernel space")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
> index 6fe52819e014..8f980e8b0867 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S
> @@ -547,6 +547,11 @@ __v7_setup_stack_ptr:
> .word PHYS_RELATIVE(__v7_setup_stack, .)
> ENDPROC(__v7_setup)
>
> + .weak cpu_v7_bugs_init
> +ENTRY(cpu_v7_bugs_init)
> + ret lr
> +ENDPROC(cpu_v7_bugs_init)
> +
> .bss
> .align 2
> __v7_setup_stack:
> @@ -554,8 +559,6 @@ __v7_setup_stack:
>
> __INITDATA
>
> - .weak cpu_v7_bugs_init
> -
> @ define struct processor (see <asm/proc-fns.h> and proc-macros.S)
> define_processor_functions v7, dabort=v7_early_abort, pabort=v7_pabort, suspend=1, bugs=cpu_v7_bugs_init
>
> --
> 2.9.0
>
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-29 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-29 10:22 [PATCH] ARM; fix cpu_v7_bugs_init reference Arnd Bergmann
2018-05-29 10:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2018-05-29 10:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-05-29 10:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180529102502.GH17671@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).