[PATCH] ARM: mcpm, perf/arm-cci: export mcpm_is_available

[PATCH] ARM: mcpm, perf/arm-cci: export mcpm_is_available

[Arnd Bergmann]

Now that the ARM CCI PMU driver can be built as a loadable module,
we get a link failure when MCPM is enabled:

ERROR: "mcpm_is_available" [drivers/perf/arm-cci.ko] undefined!

The simplest fix is to export that helper function.

Fixes: 8b0c93c20ef7 ("perf/arm-cci: Allow building as a module")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
The patch that caused this is currently part of the arm-perf/for-next/perf
branch, it would be good to have the fix there as well.
---
 arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c b/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c
index ed9e87ddbb06..037a4479b8c3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
  * published by the Free Software Foundation.
  */
 
+#include <linux/export.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/irqflags.h>
@@ -174,6 +175,7 @@ bool mcpm_is_available(void)
 {
 	return (platform_ops) ? true : false;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mcpm_is_available);
 
 /*
  * We can't use regular spinlocks. In the switcher case, it is possible
-- 
2.9.0

[PATCH] ARM: mcpm, perf/arm-cci: export mcpm_is_available

[Will Deacon]

Hi Arnd, Russell, [+Nico and Robin]

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 05:44:36PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Now that the ARM CCI PMU driver can be built as a loadable module,
> we get a link failure when MCPM is enabled:
> 
> ERROR: "mcpm_is_available" [drivers/perf/arm-cci.ko] undefined!
> 
> The simplest fix is to export that helper function.
> 
> Fixes: 8b0c93c20ef7 ("perf/arm-cci: Allow building as a module")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> The patch that caused this is currently part of the arm-perf/for-next/perf
> branch, it would be good to have the fix there as well.
> ---
>  arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

I'm happy to take this via the arm perf tree if others are ok with that.
Alternatively, I can revert the offending commit if there are objections
to exporting the symbol.

Russell: do you any preference?

Thanks,

Will

> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c b/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c
> index ed9e87ddbb06..037a4479b8c3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>   * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>   */
>  
> +#include <linux/export.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/irqflags.h>
> @@ -174,6 +175,7 @@ bool mcpm_is_available(void)
>  {
>  	return (platform_ops) ? true : false;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mcpm_is_available);
>  
>  /*
>   * We can't use regular spinlocks. In the switcher case, it is possible
> -- 
> 2.9.0
> 

[PATCH] ARM: mcpm, perf/arm-cci: export mcpm_is_available

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 04:30:14PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Arnd, Russell, [+Nico and Robin]
> 
> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 05:44:36PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Now that the ARM CCI PMU driver can be built as a loadable module,
> > we get a link failure when MCPM is enabled:
> > 
> > ERROR: "mcpm_is_available" [drivers/perf/arm-cci.ko] undefined!
> > 
> > The simplest fix is to export that helper function.
> > 
> > Fixes: 8b0c93c20ef7 ("perf/arm-cci: Allow building as a module")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > ---
> > The patch that caused this is currently part of the arm-perf/for-next/perf
> > branch, it would be good to have the fix there as well.
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> I'm happy to take this via the arm perf tree if others are ok with that.
> Alternatively, I can revert the offending commit if there are objections
> to exporting the symbol.
> 
> Russell: do you any preference?

As it claims to fix 8b0c93c20ef7, which I don't have, I can't take this
patch.  Do we know which tree has this?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up

[PATCH] ARM: mcpm, perf/arm-cci: export mcpm_is_available

[Will Deacon]

Hi Russell,

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 04:33:24PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 04:30:14PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi Arnd, Russell, [+Nico and Robin]
> > 
> > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 05:44:36PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > Now that the ARM CCI PMU driver can be built as a loadable module,
> > > we get a link failure when MCPM is enabled:
> > > 
> > > ERROR: "mcpm_is_available" [drivers/perf/arm-cci.ko] undefined!
> > > 
> > > The simplest fix is to export that helper function.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 8b0c93c20ef7 ("perf/arm-cci: Allow building as a module")
> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > > ---
> > > The patch that caused this is currently part of the arm-perf/for-next/perf
> > > branch, it would be good to have the fix there as well.
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c | 2 ++
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > I'm happy to take this via the arm perf tree if others are ok with that.
> > Alternatively, I can revert the offending commit if there are objections
> > to exporting the symbol.
> > 
> > Russell: do you any preference?
> 
> As it claims to fix 8b0c93c20ef7, which I don't have, I can't take this
> patch.  Do we know which tree has this?

Yes, sorry, it's in my for-next/perf branch:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next/perf&id=8b0c93c20ef78f15d8b760964ff79bda7f68c610

which is now in -next.

I'm happy to take the mcpm patch on top with your ack, but if you have
conflicting changes (or would prefer not to export the symbol to modules)
then I can just revert the patch in my tree for now.

Will

[PATCH] ARM: mcpm, perf/arm-cci: export mcpm_is_available

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 04:41:20PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Russell,
> 
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 04:33:24PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 04:30:14PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > Hi Arnd, Russell, [+Nico and Robin]
> > > 
> > > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 05:44:36PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > Now that the ARM CCI PMU driver can be built as a loadable module,
> > > > we get a link failure when MCPM is enabled:
> > > > 
> > > > ERROR: "mcpm_is_available" [drivers/perf/arm-cci.ko] undefined!
> > > > 
> > > > The simplest fix is to export that helper function.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: 8b0c93c20ef7 ("perf/arm-cci: Allow building as a module")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > > > ---
> > > > The patch that caused this is currently part of the arm-perf/for-next/perf
> > > > branch, it would be good to have the fix there as well.
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c | 2 ++
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > I'm happy to take this via the arm perf tree if others are ok with that.
> > > Alternatively, I can revert the offending commit if there are objections
> > > to exporting the symbol.
> > > 
> > > Russell: do you any preference?
> > 
> > As it claims to fix 8b0c93c20ef7, which I don't have, I can't take this
> > patch.  Do we know which tree has this?
> 
> Yes, sorry, it's in my for-next/perf branch:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next/perf&id=8b0c93c20ef78f15d8b760964ff79bda7f68c610
> 
> which is now in -next.
> 
> I'm happy to take the mcpm patch on top with your ack, but if you have
> conflicting changes (or would prefer not to export the symbol to modules)
> then I can just revert the patch in my tree for now.

I have no changes to that file, so:

Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up

[PATCH] ARM: mcpm, perf/arm-cci: export mcpm_is_available

[Will Deacon]

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 04:42:51PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 04:41:20PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi Russell,
> > 
> > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 04:33:24PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 04:30:14PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > Hi Arnd, Russell, [+Nico and Robin]
> > > > 
> > > > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 05:44:36PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > > Now that the ARM CCI PMU driver can be built as a loadable module,
> > > > > we get a link failure when MCPM is enabled:
> > > > > 
> > > > > ERROR: "mcpm_is_available" [drivers/perf/arm-cci.ko] undefined!
> > > > > 
> > > > > The simplest fix is to export that helper function.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fixes: 8b0c93c20ef7 ("perf/arm-cci: Allow building as a module")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > The patch that caused this is currently part of the arm-perf/for-next/perf
> > > > > branch, it would be good to have the fix there as well.
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c | 2 ++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > I'm happy to take this via the arm perf tree if others are ok with that.
> > > > Alternatively, I can revert the offending commit if there are objections
> > > > to exporting the symbol.
> > > > 
> > > > Russell: do you any preference?
> > > 
> > > As it claims to fix 8b0c93c20ef7, which I don't have, I can't take this
> > > patch.  Do we know which tree has this?
> > 
> > Yes, sorry, it's in my for-next/perf branch:
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next/perf&id=8b0c93c20ef78f15d8b760964ff79bda7f68c610
> > 
> > which is now in -next.
> > 
> > I'm happy to take the mcpm patch on top with your ack, but if you have
> > conflicting changes (or would prefer not to export the symbol to modules)
> > then I can just revert the patch in my tree for now.
> 
> I have no changes to that file, so:
> 
> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>

Thanks, I've picked up the fix from Arnd with your Ack and will push out
this evening.

Will

[PATCH] ARM: mcpm, perf/arm-cci: export mcpm_is_available

[Nicolas Pitre]

On Tue, 29 May 2018, Will Deacon wrote:

> Hi Arnd, Russell, [+Nico and Robin]
> 
> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 05:44:36PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Now that the ARM CCI PMU driver can be built as a loadable module,
> > we get a link failure when MCPM is enabled:
> > 
> > ERROR: "mcpm_is_available" [drivers/perf/arm-cci.ko] undefined!
> > 
> > The simplest fix is to export that helper function.
> > 
> > Fixes: 8b0c93c20ef7 ("perf/arm-cci: Allow building as a module")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > ---
> > The patch that caused this is currently part of the arm-perf/for-next/perf
> > branch, it would be good to have the fix there as well.
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> I'm happy to take this via the arm perf tree if others are ok with that.
> Alternatively, I can revert the offending commit if there are objections
> to exporting the symbol.

Looks fine to me.

Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>


Nicolas