From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 06:41:09 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v2 5/6] ARM: dts: Add generic interconnect target module node for MCAN In-Reply-To: References: <20180530141133.3711-1-faiz_abbas@ti.com> <20180530141133.3711-6-faiz_abbas@ti.com> <20180531040638.GA26751@rob-hp-laptop> Message-ID: <20180531134109.GJ5705@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Faiz Abbas [180531 11:27]: > On Thursday 31 May 2018 09:36 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:41:32PM +0530, Faiz Abbas wrote: > >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra76x.dtsi > >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra76x.dtsi > >> @@ -11,6 +11,25 @@ > >> / { > >> compatible = "ti,dra762", "ti,dra7"; > >> > >> + ocp { > >> + > >> + target-module at 0x42c00000 { > > > > Build your dtb with W=1 and fix warnings you add (drop '0x'). > > Sure, Will fix this. > > > > This is a CAN bus controller? If so, then use 'can' for node name. > > Yes but I am using m_can along the lines of dcan in other boards (For > example, see arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi:1046). Are you saying all CAN > controllers should only be called can? The module should be target-module at 42c00000 and the child(ren) can at 1a00 or mcan at 1a00 if mcan is different from can. Regards, Tony