From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: avoid Cortex-A9 livelock on tight dmb loops
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 10:42:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180604094241.GE9482@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1fOhn6-00008E-3b@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
Hi Russell,
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 12:00:16PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> Executing loops such as:
>
> while (1)
> cpu_relax();
>
> with interrupts disabled results in a livelock of the entire system,
> as other CPUs are prevented making progress. This is most noticable
> as a failure of crashdump kexec, which stops just after issuing:
>
> Loading crashdump kernel...
>
> to the system console. Two other locations of these loops within the
> ARM code have been identified and fixed up.
Can you confirm that this only happens if CONFIG_ARM_ERRATA_754327=y?
The only erratum I can find for A9 that matches this behaviour exists
when the body of the tight loop contains a DMB and some of the possible
workarounds are:
- Add ten NOPs after the DMB
- Use DSB instead of DMB in the tight loop
- Set bit 16 in the diagnostic control register (p15, c1, 5, 0, c0, 1)
WFE is probably fine (the write-up isn't clear), but if this only occurs
due to CONFIG_ARM_ERRATA_754327=y it would be nice to mitigate it in the
alternative cpu_relax() definition itself, which isn't generally possible
with WFE.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-04 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-01 11:00 [PATCH v2] ARM: avoid Cortex-A9 livelock on tight dmb loops Russell King
2018-06-01 15:35 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-06-01 15:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-06-01 16:12 ` Tony Lindgren
2018-06-04 9:42 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2018-06-04 18:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-01-25 21:03 Russell King
2019-01-25 23:20 ` Tony Lindgren
2019-01-26 21:00 ` Paul Walmsley
2019-01-26 23:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-01-27 1:15 ` Paul Walmsley
2019-01-27 15:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-01-31 13:58 ` Will Deacon
2019-01-31 22:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-02-01 10:19 ` Will Deacon
2019-02-01 21:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180604094241.GE9482@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).