From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dave.Martin@arm.com (Dave Martin)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 10:21:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCHv3 10/19] arm64: convert native/compat syscall entry to C
In-Reply-To: <20180619130932.ww53s5rnragcodha@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
References: <20180618120310.39527-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
 <20180618120310.39527-11-mark.rutland@arm.com>
 <20180619121814.GR22983@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>
 <20180619130932.ww53s5rnragcodha@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
Message-ID: <20180620092105.GT22983@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 02:15:24PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 01:18:17PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 01:03:01PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > +static inline void sve_user_reset(void)
> > > +{
> > 
> > Can we call this "sve_user_discard" please?
> > 
> > "Reset" is a reasonable name for the concept, but the "discard"
> > terminology has been used elsewhere.
> 
> Sure; done.
> 
> > > +	if (!system_supports_sve())
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * task_fpsimd_load() won't be called to update CPACR_EL1 in
> > > +	 * ret_to_user unless TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE is still set, which only
> > > +	 * happens if a context switch or kernel_neon_begin() or context
> > > +	 * modification (sigreturn, ptrace) intervenes.
> > > +	 * So, ensure that CPACR_EL1 is already correct for the fast-path case.
> > > +	 */
> > 
> > This comment should go after clear_thead_flag(), since it describes not
> > the purpose of this function but the presence of sve_user_disable().
> > 
> > > +	clear_thread_flag(TIF_SVE);
> > > +	sve_user_disable();
> > > +}
> 
> Good point. I've moved the clear_thread_flag(TIF_SVE) above the comment
> (with a blank line before the comment).

Thanks -- with those changes:

Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> (for the SVE parts)

Cheers
---Dave