From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: palmer@sifive.com (Palmer Dabbelt)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 10:01:21 -0700
Subject: Finish the GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER conversion
In-Reply-To: <20180621181756.12493-1-palmer@sifive.com>
References: <20180621181756.12493-1-palmer@sifive.com>
Message-ID: <20180622170126.6308-1-palmer@sifive.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com> wrote:
> A while ago I sent a patch set that adds a GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER,
> which is an exact copy of the existing IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER support in the
> arm port, which is being used unconditionally by arm64 and openrisc.
> GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER is currently being used by the RISC-V port.  I
> managed to make a few mistakes in my original patch set and as a result
> my conversion of the other architectures of GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
> was dropped.
> 
> This patch set finishes up my original patch set by converting arm,
> arm64, and openrisc over to the new GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER support
> and then removing MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER as it's obselete.
> 
> At the time I wrote this I gave it fairly extensive build testing, but
> went I recently rebased it I just tested the full patch set on arm,
> arm64, and openrisc defconfigs.
> 
> Various flavors of this patch set have bounced around a few times
> before, but I'm calling this a whole new patch set as it builds on top
> of what was merged.

Looks like I managed to lose the patches.  They should be threaded under
this message...