From: andrew@lunn.ch (Andrew Lunn)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/14] ARM: davinci: step towards removing at24_platform_data
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 19:40:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180625174024.GB17417@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180625155025.12567-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 05:50:11PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
>
> Since I took over maintainership of the at24 driver I've been working
> towards removing at24_platform_data in favor for device properties.
>
> DaVinci is the only platform that's still using it - all other users
> have already been converted.
>
> One of the obstacles in case of DaVinci is removing the setup() callback
> from the pdata struct, the only user of which are some davinci boards.
Hi Bartosz
Nice code.
I've got a platform i want to add sometime soon using the at24. I
noticed you doing the cleanup, so i avoided the setup() call. But
using it would of helped...
My platform is x86 based, so no device tree. I instantiate a number of
AT24 devices from a platform driver, and then add nvmem cells so i can
access data in these eeproms. This new code will make this simpler.
> The only board that's still using this callback is now mityomapl138.
> Unfortunately it stores more info in EEPROM than just the MAC address
> and will require some more work. Unfortunately I don't have access
> to this board so I can't test any actual solutions on a live hardware.
Depending on what i find in the EEPROM, i need to instantiate other
i2c devices. So i have the problem of knowing when the EEPROM has
actually probed and i can use the nvmem API to retrieve the contents.
What i have done so far, is registers a bus notifier on i2c_bus_type,
and look for BUS_NOTIFY_BOUND_DRIVER. I can then check if the i2c
client in the notifier is the at24 client. But when i then add more
i2c clients from inside the notifier i get lockdep splats. They are
false positives, but it does suggest it is not a good idea to do this.
So it would be good to have some sort of recommended alternative to
the setup() callback. Ideally it would be specific to a particular
at24, and safe to call other i2c functions from.
Do you have any ideas?
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-25 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-25 15:50 [PATCH 00/14] ARM: davinci: step towards removing at24_platform_data Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-25 15:50 ` [PATCH 01/14] nvmem: add support for cell lookups Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-25 15:50 ` [PATCH 02/14] ARM: davinci: dm365-evm: use nvmem lookup for mac address Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-25 15:50 ` [PATCH 03/14] ARM: davinci: dm644-evm: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-25 15:50 ` [PATCH 04/14] ARM: davinci: dm646x-evm: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-25 15:50 ` [PATCH 05/14] ARM: davinci: da830-evm: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-25 15:50 ` [PATCH 06/14] ARM: davinci: mityomapl138: add nvmem cells lookup entries Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-25 15:50 ` [PATCH 07/14] net: davinci_emac: use nvmem to retrieve the mac address Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-25 23:09 ` Grygorii Strashko
2018-06-25 15:50 ` [PATCH 08/14] ARM: davinci: mityomapl138: don't read the MAC address from machine code Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-25 15:50 ` [PATCH 09/14] ARM: davinci: dm365-evm: use device properties for at24 eeprom Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-25 15:50 ` [PATCH 10/14] ARM: davinci: da830-evm: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-25 15:50 ` [PATCH 11/14] ARM: davinci: dm644x-evm: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-25 15:50 ` [PATCH 12/14] ARM: davinci: dm646x-evm: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-25 15:50 ` [PATCH 13/14] ARM: davinci: sffsdr: fix the at24 eeprom device name Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-25 15:50 ` [PATCH 14/14] ARM: davinci: sffsdr: use device properties for at24 eeprom Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-25 17:40 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2018-06-25 17:46 ` [PATCH 00/14] ARM: davinci: step towards removing at24_platform_data Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-25 18:02 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-06-26 7:44 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-26 8:38 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-06-26 9:31 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-26 13:21 ` Andrew Lunn
2018-06-26 13:38 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-06-27 9:40 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180625174024.GB17417@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).